ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2015
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.
Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of Replacing Sugar-sweetened Beverages With Non-nutritive Sweetened Beverages or Water on Gut Microbiome and Metabolic Outcomes: STOP Sugars NOW Trial
Return of Genomic Results and Aggregate Penetrance in Population-Based Cohorts
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exploring perspectives of interest-holders on the use of health and genomic data from deceased participants in research: An updated systematic review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Pooled it
- Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2023Pooled it
- Stakeholders' perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Recommendations for return of secondary genomic findings in observational cohort studies.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Digital death and posthumous data: a glocal, relational perspective.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysis.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2023Review
- "If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data." Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens.New genetics and society · 2022Article
- "It's personalized, but it's still bucket based": The promise of personalized medicine vs. the reality of genomic risk stratification in a breast cancer screening trial.New genetics and society · 2022Article
- Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda.PloS one · 2022Article
- Should Health Systems Share Genetic Findings With At-Risk Relatives When the Proband Is Deceased? Interviews With Individuals Diagnosed With Lynch Syndrome.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022Article
- A genetic researcher's devil's dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Perspectives and ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results: a qualitative study of genomics researchers in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- What improves the likelihood of people receiving genetic test results communicating to their families about genetic risk?Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- Article
- Practices and Attitudes toward Returning Genomic Research Results to Low-Resource Research Participants.Public health genomics · 2021Article
- Perspectives regarding family disclosure of genetic research results in three racial and ethnic minority populations.Journal of community genetics · 2020Article
- Return of Results in Participant-Driven Research: Learning from Transformative Research Models.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2020Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic research results and incidental findings with health implications for a research participant are of potential interest not only to the participant, but also to the participant's family. Yet investigators lack guidance on return of results to relatives, including after the participant's death. In this paper, a national working group offers consensus analysis and recommendations, including an ethical framework to guide investigators in managing this challenging issue, before and after the participant's death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.