ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2013
Red Wolf (Canis rufus) Recovery: A Review with Suggestions for Future Research.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The paradoxical extinction: Exploring signatures of assortative mating as a possible mechanism that maintains canonical Red Wolf genetic ancestry in the American Gulf Coast canids.The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- Characterising Reference Intervals in Clinically Normal Red Wolves (Canis rufus): A Baseline for the Detection of Clinical Disease.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Kibble diet is associated with higher faecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in zoo-managed red wolves (Conservation physiology · 2024Article
- Genetic diversity and family groups detected in a coyote population with red wolf ancestry on Galveston Island, Texas.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Reviving ghost alleles: Genetically admixed coyotes along the American Gulf Coast are critical for saving the endangered red wolf.Science advances · 2022Article
- The natural history and ecology of melanism in red wolf and coyote populations of the southeastern United States - evidence for Gloger's rule.BMC zoology · 2022Article
- Evaluating how management policies affect red wolf mortality and disappearance.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Article
- Gut Microbiomes Differ Among Dietary Types and Stool Consistency in the Captive Red Wolf (Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Tracking cats revisited: Placing terrestrial mammalian carnivores on δ2H and δ18O isoscapes.PloS one · 2019Article
- Size-assortative choice and mate availability influences hybridization between red wolves (Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Demographic history influences spatial patterns of genetic diversityin recently expanded coyote (Canis latrans) populations.Heredity · 2018Article
- Describing a developing hybrid zone between red wolves and coyotes in eastern North Carolina, USA.Evolutionary applications · 2016Article
- Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Southeastern Pre-Columbian Canids.The Journal of heredity · 2016Article
- Article
- Infectious disease and red wolf conservation: assessment of disease occurrence and associated risks.Journal of mammalogy · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By the 1970s, government-supported eradication campaigns reduced red wolves to a remnant population of less than 100 individuals on the southern border of Texas and Louisiana. Restoration efforts in the region were deemed unpromising because of predator-control programs and hybridization with coyotes. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the last remaining red wolves from the wild and placed them in a captive-breeding program. In 1980, the USFWS declared red wolves extinct in the wild. During 1987, the USFWS, through the Red Wolf Recovery Program, reintroduced red wolves into northeastern North Carolina. Although restoration efforts have established a population of approximately 70-80 red wolves in the wild, issues of hybridization with coyotes, inbreeding, and human-caused mortality continue to hamper red wolf recovery. We explore these three challenges and, within each challenge, we illustrate how research can be used to resolve problems associated with red wolf-coyote interactions, effects of inbreeding, and demographic responses to human-caused mortality. We hope this illustrates the utility of research to advance restoration of red wolves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.