Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26479476›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Facility Delivery, Postnatal Care and Neonatal Deaths in India: Nationally-Representative Case-Control Studies.

Shaza A Fadel, Usha Ram, Shaun K Morris, Rehana Begum, Anita Shet, Raju Jotkar, Prabhat Jha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Whole-genome analysis of hard winter wheat germplasm identifies genomic regions associated with spike and kernel traits.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shaza A FadelCentre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Usha RamCentre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Public Health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Shaun K MorrisDivision of Infectious Diseases and Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rehana BegumCentre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Anita ShetDepartment of Pediatrics, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Raju JotkarNational Health Mission, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.
Prabhat JhaCentre for Global Health Research, St Michael's Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Strengthening monitoring of Indian tobacco mortalityR01TW005991 · FIC · ST. MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL · PI JHA, PRABHAT · 2002 to 2006
$862k
Measuring Tobacco Mortality within the Million Death Study in IndiaR01TW007939 · FIC · ST. MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL · PI JHA, PRABHAT · 2007 to 2010
$540k
CIHRFIC NIH HHS R01 TW005991FIC NIH HHS R01 TW007939FIC NIH HHS R01-TW05991-01FIC NIH HHS TW007939-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical studies demonstrate the efficacy of interventions to reduce neonatal deaths, but there are fewer studies of their real-life effectiveness. In India, women often seek facility delivery after complications arise, rather than to avoid complications. Our objective was to quantify the association of facility delivery and postnatal checkups with neonatal mortality while examining the "reverse causality" in which the mothers deliver at a health facility due to adverse perinatal events.

methodsWe conducted nationally representative case-control studies of about 300,000 live births and 4,000 neonatal deaths to examine the effect of, place of delivery and postnatal checkup on neonatal mortality. We compared neonatal deaths to all live births and to a subset of live births reporting excessive bleeding or obstructed labour that were more comparable to cases in seeking care.

findingsIn the larger study of 2004-8 births, facility delivery without postnatal checkup was associated with an increased odds of neonatal death (Odds ratio = 2.5; 99% CI 2.2-2.9), especially for early versus late neonatal deaths. However, use of more comparable controls showed marked attenuation (Odds ratio = 0.5; 0.4-0.5). Facility delivery with postnatal checkup was associated with reduced odds of neonatal death. Excess risks were attenuated in the earlier study of 2001-4 births.

conclusionThe combined effect of facility deliveries with postnatal checks ups is substantially higher than just facility delivery alone. Evaluation of the real-life effectiveness of interventions to reduce child and maternal deaths need to consider reverse causality. If these associations are causal, facility delivery with postnatal check up could avoid about 1/3 of all neonatal deaths in India (~100,000/year).

Indexed as

Perinatal DeathAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesChildDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26479476
PMCPMC4610669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.