Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26478910›Full record

RevieweNeuro2015

Developing Extracellular Matrix Technology to Treat Retinal or Optic Nerve Injury(1,2,3).

Tanchen Ren, Yolandi van der Merwe, Michael B Steketee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eNeuro, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tenascins in Retinal and Optic Nerve Neurodegeneration.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanchen RenDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15216 ; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219.
Yolandi van der MerweDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15216 ; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 ; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
Michael B SteketeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15216 ; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 ; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15216.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult mammalian CNS neurons often degenerate after injury, leading to lost neurologic functions. In the visual system, retinal or optic nerve injury often leads to retinal ganglion cell axon degeneration and irreversible vision loss. CNS axon degeneration is increasingly linked to the innate immune response to injury, which leads to tissue-destructive inflammation and scarring. Extracellular matrix (ECM) technology can reduce inflammation, while increasing functional tissue remodeling, over scarring, in various tissues and organs, including the peripheral nervous system. However, applying ECM technology to CNS injuries has been limited and virtually unstudied in the visual system. Here we discuss advances in deriving fetal CNS-specific ECMs, like fetal porcine brain, retina, and optic nerve, and fetal non-CNS-specific ECMs, like fetal urinary bladder, and the potential for using tissue-specific ECMs to treat retinal or optic nerve injuries in two platforms. The first platform is an ECM hydrogel that can be administered as a retrobulbar, periocular, or even intraocular injection. The second platform is an ECM hydrogel and polymer "biohybrid" sheet that can be readily shaped and wrapped around a nerve. Both platforms can be tuned mechanically and biochemically to deliver factors like neurotrophins, immunotherapeutics, or stem cells. Since clinical CNS therapies often use general anti-inflammatory agents, which can reduce tissue-destructive inflammation but also suppress tissue-reparative immune system functions, tissue-specific, ECM-based devices may fill an important need by providing naturally derived, biocompatible, and highly translatable platforms that can modulate the innate immune response to promote a positive functional outcome.

Indexed as

axon regenerationECMimmunotherapyregenerative medicineretinal ganglion cell

Identifiers

PMID26478910
PMCPMC4603254
OpenAlexW1775988723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.