ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015
Hepatitis C virus markers in infection by hepatitis C virus: In the era of directly acting antivirals.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-hepatitis C antibody carriage and risk of liver impairment in rural-Cameroon: adapting the control of hepatocellular carcinoma for resource-limited settings.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Observational
- Removal of medicaid restrictions were associated with increased hepatitis C virus treatment rates, but disparities persist.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2022Article
- Electronic medical record-verified hepatitis C virus screening in a large health system.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Epidemiology and management of hepatitis C virus infections in immigrant populations.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2019Review
- Resistance detection and re-treatment options in hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver diseases after DAA-treatment failure.Infection · 2018Review
- Hepatitis C Virus Screening Trends: Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey Population, 2013-2015.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018Article
- Noninvasive Assessment of Fibrosis Regression in Hepatitis C Virus Sustained Virologic Responders.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Article
- Etiology of chronic liver diseases in the Northwest of Italy, 1998 through 2014.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Occult HBV infection in HCC and cirrhotic tissue of HBsAg-negative patients: a virological and clinical study.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in healthcare workers.World journal of hepatology · 2016Review
- Hepatitis C Virus Screening: Factors Associated With Test Completion in a Large Academic Health Care System.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
About 130-170 million people are infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide and more than 350000 people die each year of HCV-related liver diseases. The combination of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) was recommended as the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis C for nearly a decade. In 2011 the directly acting antivirals (DAA) HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors, telaprevir and boceprevir, were approved to treat HCV-genotype-1 infection, each in triple combination with Peg-IFN and RBV. These treatments allowed higher rates of SVR than the double Peg-IFN + RBV, but the low tolerability and high pill burden of these triple regimes were responsible for reduced adherence and early treatment discontinuation. The second and third wave DAAs introduced in 2013-2014 enhanced the efficacy and tolerability of anti-HCV treatment. Consequently, the traditional indicators for disease management and predictors of treatment response should be revised in light of these new therapeutic options. This review article will focus on the use of the markers of HCV infection and replication, of laboratory and instrumental data to define the stage of the disease and of predictors, if any, of response to therapy in the DAA era. The article is addressed particularly to physicians who have patients with hepatitis C in care in their everyday clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.