Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26478629›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2015

Data collection tools for maternal and child health in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review.

Thidar Pyone, Fiona Dickinson, Robbie Kerr, Cynthia Boschi-Pinto, Matthews Mathai, Nynke van den Broek

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thidar PyoneCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, E3 5QA, England .
Fiona DickinsonCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, E3 5QA, England .
Robbie KerrCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, E3 5QA, England .
Cynthia Boschi-PintoDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland .
Matthews MathaiDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland .
Nynke van den BroekCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, E3 5QA, England .

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe tools used for the assessment of maternal and child health issues in humanitarian emergency settings.

methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and POPLINE databases for studies published between January 2000 and June 2014. We also searched the websites of organizations active in humanitarian emergencies. We included studies reporting the development or use of data collection tools concerning the health of women and children in humanitarian emergencies. We used narrative synthesis to summarize the studies.

findingsWe identified 100 studies: 80 reported on conflict situations and 20 followed natural disasters. Most studies (76/100) focused on the health status of the affected population while 24 focused on the availability and coverage of health services. Of 17 different data collection tools identified, 14 focused on sexual and reproductive health, nine concerned maternal, newborn and child health and four were used to collect information on sexual or gender-based violence. Sixty-nine studies were done for monitoring and evaluation purposes, 18 for advocacy, seven for operational research and six for needs assessment.

conclusionPractical and effective means of data collection are needed to inform life-saving actions in humanitarian emergencies. There are a wide variety of tools available, not all of which have been used in the field. A simplified, standardized tool should be developed for assessment of health issues in the early stages of humanitarian emergencies. A cluster approach is recommended, in partnership with operational researchers and humanitarian agencies, coordinated by the World Health Organization.

Indexed as

AltruismEmergenciesChild HealthData CollectionHumansMaternal Health

Identifiers

PMID26478629
PMCPMC4581640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.