Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26478627›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2015

Cost-effectiveness of community-based practitioner programmes in Ethiopia, Indonesia and Kenya.

Barbara McPake, Ijeoma Edoka, Sophie Witter, Karina Kielmann, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Marjolein Dieleman, Kelsey Vaughan, Elvis Gama, Maryse Kok, Daniel Datiko and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Barbara McPakeNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia .
Ijeoma EdokaInstitute for International Health & Development, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret Drive Musselburgh, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, Scotland .
Sophie WitterInstitute for International Health & Development, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret Drive Musselburgh, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, Scotland .
Karina KielmannInstitute for International Health & Development, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret Drive Musselburgh, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, Scotland .
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England .
Marjolein DielemanRoyal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands .
Kelsey VaughanRoyal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands .
Elvis GamaDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England .
Maryse KokRoyal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands .
Daniel DatikoREACHOUT, Hidase Hulentenawi Agelglot Yebego Adragot Mahber, Awassa, Ethiopia .
Lillian OtisoREACHOUT, LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya .
Rukhsana AhmedDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England .
Neil SquiresPublic Health England, North of England Region, England .
Chutima SuraratdechaUnited States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, United States of America .
Giorgio ComettoGlobal Health Workforce Alliance, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland .

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100654World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of community-based practitioner programmes in Ethiopia, Indonesia and Kenya.

methodsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the three programmes were estimated from a government perspective. Cost data were collected for 2012. Life years gained were estimated based on coverage of reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health services. For Ethiopia and Kenya, estimates of coverage before and after the implementation of the programme were obtained from empirical studies. For Indonesia, coverage of health service interventions was estimated from routine data. We used the Lives Saved Tool to estimate the number of lives saved from changes in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health-service coverage. Gross domestic product per capita was used as the reference willingness-to-pay threshold value.

findingsThe estimated incremental cost per life year gained was 82 international dollars ($)in Kenya, $999 in Ethiopia and $3396 in Indonesia. The results were most sensitive to uncertainty in the estimates of life-years gained. Based on the results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis, there was greater than 80% certainty that each programme was cost-effective.

conclusionCommunity-based approaches are likely to be cost-effective for delivery of some essential health interventions where community-based practitioners operate within an integrated team supported by the health system. Community-based practitioners may be most appropriate in rural poor communities that have limited access to more qualified health professionals. Further research is required to understand which programmatic design features are critical to effectiveness.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHealth PersonnelDelivery of Health CareEthiopiaHealth FacilitiesIndonesiaKenyaOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26478627
PMCPMC4581637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.