Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26478223›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2016

Predicting Large RNA-Like Topologies by a Knowledge-Based Clustering Approach.

Naoto Baba, Shereef Elmetwaly, Namhee Kim, Tamar Schlick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Fiedler Vector Scoring Approach for Novel RNA Motif Selection.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adventures with RNA graphs.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Challenges in RNA Structural Modeling and Design.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naoto BabaDepartment of Chemistry and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA; Department of Chemistry, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan.
Shereef ElmetwalyDepartment of Chemistry and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA.
Namhee KimDepartment of Chemistry and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA.
Tamar SchlickDepartment of Chemistry and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA; NYU-ECNU Center for Computational Chemistry at NYU Shanghai, 3663 Zhongshan Road North, Shanghai, 200062, China. Electronic address: schlick@nyu.edu.

Funding

Modeling RNA Tertiary Structure Folding by a Hierarchical FrameworkR01GM100469 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLICK, TAMAR · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
Computational studies of in vitro selection of RNAsR01GM081410 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLICK, TAMAR · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM081410NIGMS NIH HHS GM100469NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081410NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An analysis and expansion of our resource for classifying, predicting, and designing RNA structures, RAG (RNA-As-Graphs), is presented, with the goal of understanding features of RNA-like and non-RNA-like motifs and exploiting this information for RNA design. RAG was first reported in 2004 for cataloging RNA secondary structure motifs using graph representations. In 2011, the RAG resource was updated with the increased availability of RNA structures and was improved by utilities for analyzing RNA structures, including substructuring and search tools. We also classified RNA structures as graphs up to 10 vertices (~200 nucleotides) into three classes: existing, RNA-like, and non-RNA-like using clustering approaches. Here, we focus on the tree graphs and evaluate the newly founded RNAs since 2011, which also support our refined predictions of RNA-like motifs. We expand the RAG resource for large tree graphs up to 13 vertices (~260 nucleotides), thereby cataloging more than 10 times as many secondary structures. We apply clustering algorithms based on features of RNA secondary structures translated from known tertiary structures to suggest which hypothetical large RNA motifs can be considered "RNA-like". The results by the PAM (Partitioning Around Medoids) approach, in particular, reveal good accuracy, with small error for the largest cases. The RAG update here up to 13 vertices offers a useful graph-based tool for exploring RNA motifs and suggesting large RNA motifs for design.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, Nucleic AcidRNARNAPrediction of RNA-like motifsRNA atlasRNA designRNA motifsRNA secondary structure

Identifiers

PMID26478223
PMCPMC4789128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.