ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2016
When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority.
Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participant Perspectives on Data Sharing in Clinical Craniofacial Research: Qualitative Interviews With Participants With Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Caregivers.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026Article
- Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2023Article
- Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data.Journal of medical ethics · 2023Article
- Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Ethical and Policy Considerations for Genomic Testing in Pediatric Research: The Path Toward Disclosing Individual Research Results.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2019Article
- A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2019Article
- Anticipatory Waivers of Consent for Pediatric Biobanking.Ethics & human research · 2019Article
- Reconsidering the Need for Reconsent at 18.Pediatrics · 2018Review
- An Observational Study of Children's Involvement in Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.