ArticleZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2015
[Therapeutic effect of CY-fTBI and BMM conditioning regimen in the process of allo-HSCT treating Ⅲ,Ⅳ non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 15 years analysis of single-center].
Article in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation（allo-HSCT）in the treatment of patients with Ⅲ,Ⅳ non-Hodgkin lymphoma（NHL）, and compared the efficacy between Cy- fractionated to talbody irradiation（fTBI）based conditioning regimen and Maryland, horse flange and mitoxantrone（BMM）.
methodsThe clinical data of 47 patients with Ⅲ, Ⅳ NHL after allo- HSCT from November 1998 to May 2014 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. To observe the hematopoietic reconstruction recovery after transplantation, cumulative incidence of acute graft- versus- host- disease （aGVHD） and chronic graft- versus- host- disease （cGVHD）, transplantation related mortality （TRM）, recurrence rate （RR）, disease- free survival （DFS）, overall survival（OS）. Compare the efficacy of fTBI and BMM conditioning regimen at the same time.
resultsNeutrophils achieving 0.5×10⁹/L and platelets achieving 50×10⁹/L on day 17 （range, 10- 72） post transplantation. Acute GVHD occurred in 53.19%, among them, grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ occurred in 42.55%, grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ occurred in 10.65%, and cGVHD occurred in 21.28%. 21 patients were alive with a median follow up of 9.7 months（0.2-149.1 months）. Overall survival（OS）was 73.5%, 49.3%, 40.1% respectively in the first, third and fifth year in Cy-fTBI group; in BMM group it was 67.8%, 32.9% and 31.4% respectively, and disease-free survival（DFS）was 65.3%, 45.6%, 30.2% respectively in the first, third and fifth year. In Cy-fTBI group, the recurrence rate（RR）and transplantation related mortality（TRM）in the first year were 18.9%, 23.0% respectively, the third year were 19.5%, 38.3% and the fifth year were 35.2%, 39.2%. In BMM group, RR and TRM in the first year were 27.4%, 24.5% respectively, the third year were 38.9%, 46.4% and the fifth year were 39.2%, 48.2%. However, there was no significant difference in the indicator of OS, DFS, RR, TRM in the two groups.
conclusionAllo-HSCT could make some Ⅲ,Ⅳ NHL patients achieve long-term disease- free survival, but the TRM was still high relatively. Moreover, compared with the program of BMM conditioning regimen, Cy-fTBI might reduce the TRM and RR, meanwhile, increase the DFS and OS. However, due to the small number cases of two groups, there was no statistical significant difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.