Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26477511›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Lifespan and Stress Resistance in Drosophila with Overexpressed DNA Repair Genes.

Mikhail Shaposhnikov, Ekaterina Proshkina, Lyubov Shilova, Alex Zhavoronkov, Alexey Moskalev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Plastic Fly: WhatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Physical Resilience as a Predictor of Lifespan and Late-Life Health in Genetically Heterogeneous Mice.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Genomic Instability and Epigenetic Changes during Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Mitigating age-related somatic mutation burden.Trends in molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The landscape of aging.Science China. Life sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikhail ShaposhnikovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Ekaterina ProshkinaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Lyubov ShilovaInstitute of Biology of Komi Science Center of Ural Branch of RAS, Syktyvkar, 167982, Russia.
Alex ZhavoronkovInsilico Medicine, Inc, Johns Hopkins University, ETC, B301, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Alexey MoskalevEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RUInstitute of Chemistry, Komi Science Center · RUJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair declines with age and correlates with longevity in many animal species. In this study, we investigated the effects of GAL4-induced overexpression of genes implicated in DNA repair on lifespan and resistance to stress factors in Drosophila melanogaster. Stress factors included hyperthermia, oxidative stress, and starvation. Overexpression was either constitutive or conditional and either ubiquitous or tissue-specific (nervous system). Overexpressed genes included those involved in recognition of DNA damage (homologs of HUS1, CHK2), nucleotide and base excision repair (homologs of XPF, XPC and AP-endonuclease-1), and repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (homologs of BRCA2, XRCC3, KU80 and WRNexo). The overexpression of different DNA repair genes led to both positive and negative effects on lifespan and stress resistance. Effects were dependent on GAL4 driver, stage of induction, sex, and role of the gene in the DNA repair process. While the constitutive/neuron-specific and conditional/ubiquitous overexpression of DNA repair genes negatively impacted lifespan and stress resistance, the constitutive/ubiquitous and conditional/neuron-specific overexpression of Hus1, mnk, mei-9, mus210, and WRNexo had beneficial effects. This study demonstrates for the first time the effects of overexpression of these DNA repair genes on both lifespan and stress resistance in D. melanogaster.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsDNA DamageDNA RepairDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleFeverHumansLongevityMaleOxidative StressStress, PhysiologicalDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26477511
PMCPMC4609912
OpenAlexW1802862830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.