Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26477478›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017

Breast Cancer Survivor Advocacy at a University Hospital: Development of a Peer Support Program with Evaluation by Patients, Advocates, and Clinicians.

Jennifer A Mirrielees, Kayla R Breckheimer, Teresa A White, Deb A Denure, Michelle M Schroeder, Martha E Gaines, Lee G Wilke, Amye J Tevaarwerk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peer Mentors for People with Advanced Cancer: Lessons Learnt from Recruiting and Training Peer Mentors for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Who is your ideal peer mentor? A qualitative study to identify cancer patient preferences for a digital peer support app.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Social support during re-entry period and long-term quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a 10-year longitudinal cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  6. Medical Advocacy among Latina Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Self-help friendliness in cancer care: A cross-sectional study among self-help group leaders in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Social Support and Meaning of Life in Women with Breast Cancer.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Knowledge matters and empowers: HPV vaccine advocacy among HPV-related cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  16. Taking control over our health: Empowerment as perceived by young adults living with advanced cancer.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  17. Avoir sa santé en main : le sentiment d'habilitation tel que perçu par les jeunes adultes souffrant d'un cancer avancé.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  18. Could Peer Support Programs Be a Good Resource for Managing the Unmet Needs of Cancer Patients?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  19. Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer A MirrieleesUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Kayla R BreckheimerUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Teresa A WhiteUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Deb A DenureUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Michelle M SchroederUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Martha E GainesUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Lee G WilkeUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Amye J TevaarwerkUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. at4@medicine.wisc.edu.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000428 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000428NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer-to-peer support programs provide unique psychosocial and educational support for breast cancer patients. A Patient Survivor Advocacy (PSA) program was developed by the University of Wisconsin Breast Center (UWBC) to provide support for newly diagnosed patients from peers who had completed primary treatment. In this study, we evaluated patient, advocate, and clinician experience with the PSA program. A program matching volunteer peer advocates at least 1 year removed from primary treatment with newly diagnosed patients was developed. Peer advocates were recruited from the practices of UWBC clinicians and received in-person training on six dimensions of peer advocacy. Trained advocates were then paired based on demographic and medical history with new patients referred to the program. Survey assessment tools were distributed to assess peer advocate and patient satisfaction, as well as clinician experience. Forty patients have been matched with seven advocates, with contact largely by email (53 %) or phone (36 %). Patients and peer advocates reported satisfaction with the program. The majority of patients (92.9 %) reported that the program was "helpful" and that they would recommend the PSA program to another woman with breast cancer. All peer advocates (100 %) responded with a sense of achievement in their advocate roles. Clinicians noted challenges in referral to the program. Peer advocates can provide key emotional and psychosocial support to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. The peer advocate, patient, and clinician feedback collected in this study will inform the future development of this program at our and peer institutions.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHospitals, UniversityPatient AdvocacyPeer GroupVolunteersBreast NeoplasmsCounselingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProgram EvaluationReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvocacyCancer survivorshipPeer-to-peer

Identifiers

PMID26477478
PMCPMC4837082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.