Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26477315›Full record

ArticleOncogene2016

Murine melanomas accelerated by a single UVR exposure carry photoproduct footprints but lack UV signature C>T mutations in critical genes.

P Mukhopadhyay, B Ferguson, H K Muller, H Y Handoko, G J Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of the Influence of UVR in Cutaneous Melanoma.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. UVB mutagenesis differs inLife science alliance · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DNA Copy Number Variations as Markers of Mutagenic Impact.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P MukhopadhyayQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
B FergusonQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
H K MullerSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
H Y HandokoQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
G J WalkerQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure increases malignant melanoma (MM) risk, but in the context of acute, not cumulative exposure. C>T and CC>TT changes make up the overwhelming majority of single base substitutions (SBS) in MM DNA, as both precursor melanocytes and melanocytic lesions have incurred incidental exposures to sunlight. To study the mutagenic mechanisms by which acute sunburn accelerates MM, we sequenced the exomes of spontaneous and neonatal UVB-induced Cdk4-R24C::Tyr-NRASQ61K mouse MMs. UVR-induced MMs carried more SBSs than spontaneous MMs, but the levels of genomic instability, reflected by translocations and copy number changes, were not different. C>T/G>A was the most common SBS in spontaneous and UVR-induced MMs, only modestly increased in the latter. However, they tended to occur at the motif A/GpCpG (reflecting C>T transition due to spontaneous deamination of cytosine at CpG) in spontaneous MMs, and T/CpCpC/T (reflecting the effects of pyrimidine dimers on either side of the mutated C) in UVR-induced MMs. Unlike MMs associated with repetitive exposures, we observed no CC>TT changes. In addition, we also found UVR 'footprints' at T>A/A>Ts (at NpTpT) and T>C/A>G (at CpTpC). These footprints are also present in MMs from a chronic UVR mouse model, and in some human MMs, suggesting that they may be minor UVR signature changes. We found few significantly somatically mutated genes (~6 per spontaneous and 15 per UVR-induced melanoma) in addition to the Cdk4 and NRAS mutations already present. Trp53 was the most convincing recurrently mutated gene; however, in the UVR-induced MMs no Trp53 mutations were at C>T/G>A, suggesting that it was probably mutated during tumour progression, not directly induced by UVR photoproducts. The very low load of recurrent mutations convincingly induced by classical UVB-induced dimer photoproducts may support a role for cell extrinsic mechanisms, such as photoimmunosuppression and inflammation in driving MM after acute UVB exposure.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAnimalsAnimals, NewbornDNA Copy Number VariationsExomeHumansINDEL MutationKaplan-Meier EstimateMelanomaMicePoint MutationSequence Analysis, DNASkinSkin NeoplasmsTranslocation, GeneticTumor Suppressor ProteinsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26477315
OpenAlexW1789712937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.