Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476860›Full record

ArticleEvaluation and program planning2016

The power of a collaborative relationship between technical assistance providers and community prevention teams: A correlational and longitudinal study.

Sarah M Chilenski, Daniel F Perkins, Jonathan Olson, Lesa Hoffman, Mark E Feinberg, Mark Greenberg, Janet Welsh, D Max Crowley, Richard Spoth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Examining the Highs and Lows of the Collaborative Relationship Between Technical Assistance Providers and Prevention Implementers.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  3. Improvements in Capacity Among Community Coalitions Receiving Technical Assistance Through the Coalition Check-Up.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah M ChilenskiPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, United States; The Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, The Pennsylvania State University, United States. Electronic address: sem268@psu.edu.
Daniel F PerkinsThe Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, and the Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Jonathan OlsonThe Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Lesa HoffmanSchiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, University of Kansas, United States.
Mark E FeinbergPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Mark GreenbergPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Janet WelshPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
D Max CrowleyPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, United States; Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Richard SpothPartnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, United States.

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
Rural Family and Community Drug Abuse Prevention ProjectR01AA014702 · NIAAA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2003 to 2007
$3.0M
Toward a PROSPER State Partnership Network: Building Infrastructure and CapacityRC2DA028879 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2009 to 2010
$2.7M
Adoption and Implementation Support Innovations for PROSPER Partnership-Based EBIR18DP002279 · DP · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, MARK T., SPOTH, RICHARD · 2009 to 2011
$1.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP 002279NCCDPHP CDC HHS R18 DP002279NIAAA NIH HHS AA14702NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014702NIDA NIH HHS DA013709NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS RC2 DA028879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, effectiveness of community collaborative prevention efforts has been mixed. Consequently, research has been undertaken to better understand the factors that support their effectiveness; theory and some related empirical research suggests that the provision of technical assistance is one important supporting factor. The current study examines one aspect of technical assistance that may be important in supporting coalition effectiveness, the collaborative relationship between the technical assistance provider and site lead implementer.

methodsFour and one-half years of data were collected from technical assistance providers and prevention team members from the 14 community prevention teams involved in the PROSPER project.

resultsSpearman correlation analyses with longitudinal data show that the levels of the collaborative relationship during one phase of collaborative team functioning associated with characteristics of internal team functioning in future phases.

conclusionsResults suggest that community collaborative prevention work should consider the collaborative nature of the technical assistance provider - prevention community team relationship when designing and conducting technical assistance activities, and it may be important to continually assess these dynamics to support high quality implementation.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsCooperative BehaviorGroup ProcessesHealth EducationHumansLeadershipLongitudinal StudiesPreventive Health ServicesProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesCommunity collaborationCooperative Extension SystemEvidence-based programsImplementation qualityPreventionPROSPERTechnical assistance

Identifiers

PMID26476860
PMCPMC4666771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.