Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476810›Full record

ArticleSolid state nuclear magnetic resonance2015

Evolution of CPMAS under fast magic-angle-spinning at 100 kHz and beyond.

Ayesha Wickramasinghe, Songlin Wang, Isamu Matsuda, Yusuke Nishiyama, Takahiro Nemoto, Yuki Endo, Yoshitaka Ishii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Breaking theACS measurement science au · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Low-power WALTZ decoupling under magic-angle spinning NMR.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. UltrafastMolecular pharmaceutics · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ayesha WickramasingheDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Songlin WangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Isamu MatsudaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Yusuke NishiyamaJEOL RESONANCE Inc., 3-1-2 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan; RIKEN CLST-JEOL Collaboration Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Takahiro NemotoJEOL RESONANCE Inc., 3-1-2 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan.
Yuki EndoJEOL RESONANCE Inc., 3-1-2 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan.
Yoshitaka IshiiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States; Center for Structural Biology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States. Electronic address: yishii@uic.edu.

Funding

Acquisition of 700 MHz Wide-Bore NMR System for Solid-state NMRS10RR025105 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ISHII, YOSHITAKA · 2009 to 2009
$2.0M
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR025105NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes recent trends of high-field solid-state NMR (SSNMR) experiments for small organic molecules and biomolecules using (13)C and (15)N CPMAS under ultra-fast MAS at a spinning speed (νR) of 80-100kHz. First, we illustrate major differences between a modern low-power RF scheme using UFMAS in an ultra-high field and a traditional CPMAS scheme using a moderate sample spinning in a lower field. Features and sensitivity advantage of a low-power RF scheme using UFMAS and a small sample coil are summarized for CPMAS-based experiments. Our 1D (13)C CPMAS experiments for uniformly (13)C- and (15)N-labeled alanine demonstrated that the sensitivity per given sample amount obtained at νR of 100kHz and a (1)H NMR frequency (νH) of 750.1MHz is ~10 fold higher than that of a traditional CPMAS experiment obtained at νR of 20kHz and νH of 400.2MHz. A comparison of different (1)H-decoupling schemes in CPMAS at νR of 100kHz for the same sample demonstrated that low-power WALTZ-16 decoupling unexpectedly displayed superior performance over traditional low-power schemes designed for SSNMR such as TPPM and XiX in a range of decoupling field strengths of 5-20kHz. Excellent (1)H decoupling performance of WALTZ-16 was confirmed on a protein microcrystal sample of GB1 at νR of 80kHz. We also discuss the feasibility of a SSNMR microanalysis of a GB1 protein sample in a scale of 1nmol to 80nmol by (1)H-detected 2D (15)N/(1)H SSNMR by a synergetic use of a high field, a low-power RF scheme, a paramagnetic-assisted condensed data collection (PACC), and UFMAS.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProteinsProteins(1)H decoupling(1)H detectionComposite-pulse decouplingMicro-analysisSolid-state NMRUltra-fast MASWALTZ

Identifiers

PMID26476810
PMCPMC4674312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.