ArticleSolid state nuclear magnetic resonance2015
Evolution of CPMAS under fast magic-angle-spinning at 100 kHz and beyond.
Article in Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking theACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Side-chain-selective deuterium labeling by a simple bio-expression method enhances resolution and simplifies spectra inJournal of biomolecular NMR · 2025Article
- Higher Order Structure Differences Among Insulin Crystalline Drugs Revealed by 2D heteronuclear NMR.ChemMedChem · 2024Article
- Low-power WALTZ decoupling under magic-angle spinning NMR.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2024Article
- Ultrafast Magic Angle Spinning Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy: Advances in Methodology and Applications.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Efficient solvent suppression with adiabatic inversion forJournal of biomolecular NMR · 2021Article
- Sensitivity-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Detection of Structural Differences and Unique Polymorphs in Pico- to Nanomolar Amounts of Brain-Derived and Synthetic 42-Residue Amyloid-β Fibrils.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021Article
- UltrafastMolecular pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Improving the quality of oriented membrane protein spectra using heat-compensated separated local field experiments.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2019Article
- Progress in proton-detected solid-state NMR (SSNMR): Super-fast 2D SSNMR collection for nano-mole-scale proteins.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2018Article
- Expanding the horizons for structural analysis of fully protonated protein assemblies by NMR spectroscopy at MAS frequencies above 100 kHz.Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2017Article
- Article
- On the use of ultracentrifugal devices for routine sample preparation in biomolecular magic-angle-spinning NMR.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2017Article
- Proton-detected 3D (15)N/(1)H/(1)H isotropic/anisotropic/isotropic chemical shift correlation solid-state NMR at 70kHz MAS.Solid state nuclear magnetic resonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article describes recent trends of high-field solid-state NMR (SSNMR) experiments for small organic molecules and biomolecules using (13)C and (15)N CPMAS under ultra-fast MAS at a spinning speed (νR) of 80-100kHz. First, we illustrate major differences between a modern low-power RF scheme using UFMAS in an ultra-high field and a traditional CPMAS scheme using a moderate sample spinning in a lower field. Features and sensitivity advantage of a low-power RF scheme using UFMAS and a small sample coil are summarized for CPMAS-based experiments. Our 1D (13)C CPMAS experiments for uniformly (13)C- and (15)N-labeled alanine demonstrated that the sensitivity per given sample amount obtained at νR of 100kHz and a (1)H NMR frequency (νH) of 750.1MHz is ~10 fold higher than that of a traditional CPMAS experiment obtained at νR of 20kHz and νH of 400.2MHz. A comparison of different (1)H-decoupling schemes in CPMAS at νR of 100kHz for the same sample demonstrated that low-power WALTZ-16 decoupling unexpectedly displayed superior performance over traditional low-power schemes designed for SSNMR such as TPPM and XiX in a range of decoupling field strengths of 5-20kHz. Excellent (1)H decoupling performance of WALTZ-16 was confirmed on a protein microcrystal sample of GB1 at νR of 80kHz. We also discuss the feasibility of a SSNMR microanalysis of a GB1 protein sample in a scale of 1nmol to 80nmol by (1)H-detected 2D (15)N/(1)H SSNMR by a synergetic use of a high field, a low-power RF scheme, a paramagnetic-assisted condensed data collection (PACC), and UFMAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.