Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476625›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Defining the efficacy of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in different emetogenic settings-a meta-analysis.

Karin Jordan, David G Warr, Axel Hinke, Linda Sun, Paul J Hesketh

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Is the addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist beneficial in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. 5HTCancer science · 2021
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intracellular emetic signaling evoked by the L-type CaEuropean journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Karin JordanDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Hematology/Oncology, Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, 06120, Halle, Germany. karin.jordan@uk-halle.de.
David G WarrPrincess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Axel HinkeWiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbH, Karl-Benz-Strasse 1, D-40764, Langenfeld, Germany.
Linda SunMerck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ, 07033, USA.
Paul J HeskethDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
Lahey Medical Center · USLuther University · KRMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1RAs) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) across different categories of chemotherapeutic emetogenicity.

methodsA systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed) and OVID databases, plus major oncology conferences, identified randomized, controlled trials evaluating NK1RAs in combination with a 5-HT3 RA plus a glucocorticoid for management of CINV. Efficacy end points were no emesis, no nausea, and complete response (CR) rates. Data were analyzed using a random effects model.

resultsTwenty-three trials (N = 11,814) were identified. Based on absolute differences (AD) for no emesis (21 %), no nausea (8 %), CR (16 %), and odd ratios (OR) of 2.62, 1.43, and 2.16, respectively, NK1RA regimens provided better CINV protection versus control groups (all p < 0.00001) in patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). In patients receiving anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC)-based HEC, respective ADs and ORs were 14, 4, and 11 % and 1.97 (p < 0.0001), 1.17 (p = 0.04), and 1.62 (p < 0.00001). In patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (3 trials), no statistically significant benefit of NK1RAs was found; however, positive trends were detected for CR and no emesis. NK1RAs were effective for CINV prevention in a small number of studies using high-dose chemotherapy as conditioning prior to stem cell transplant and cisplatin-based multiple-day chemotherapy (MDC).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of NK1RA in preventing vomiting in patients receiving HEC (including AC), with smaller effects on prevention of nausea. Efficacy is also seen with high-dose chemotherapy and cisplatin-based MDC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNauseaVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsAntiemeticsChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingEmetogenicityNeurokinin-1 receptor

Identifiers

PMID26476625
OpenAlexW1942906531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.