Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476536›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Comparison of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT findings with vascular endothelial growth factors and receptors in colorectal cancer.

Ahmet Kocael, Betül Vatankulu, Osman Şimşek, Mahir Cengiz, Ahu Kemik, Pınar Kocael, Metin Halaç, Kerim Sönmezoğlu, Kenan Ulualp

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation between Skip N2 Metastases and SUVBioMed research international · 2020
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmet KocaelDepartment of Surgery, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, İstanbul, Turkey.
Betül VatankuluDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, Aksaray, İstanbul, Turkey. bvatankulu@gmail.com.
Osman ŞimşekDepartment of Surgery, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mahir CengizDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ahu KemikDepartment of Biochemistry, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, İstanbul, Turkey.
Pınar KocaelDepartment of Surgery, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, İstanbul, Turkey.
Metin HalaçDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, Aksaray, İstanbul, Turkey.
Kerim SönmezoğluDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, Aksaray, İstanbul, Turkey.
Kenan UlualpDepartment of Surgery, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, University of İstanbul, İstanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT findings with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family and its receptor (VEGFR) levels in metastatic and nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Fluorine-18 FDG-PET/CT scans were performed for initial staging and restaging of patients with CRC. FDG-PET/CT findings of tumor (such as the presence of a primary tumor, the lymphatic or distance metastases, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor), serum VEGF A-C-D-E levels, and serum VEGF receptor 1-2-3 levels were analyzed. A total of 63 patients were included into the study (35 males, mean age 61.3 ± 11.9 years). Patients were divided into two groups, based on positive and negative PET/CT findings. Patients were also categorized according to the presence of metastasis. All evaluated parameters were significantly higher in the PET/CT-positive group than the PET/CT-negative group (p < 0.001). All those parameters were also positively correlated with each other. The highest correlation for SUVmax of primary tumor was found with VEGFR-3 (p < 0.001, r = 0.665). Patients with metastases had high levels of VEGF-D, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-E, and VEGFR-3 than those without metastases. These parameters had better specificity and sensitivity values than the SUVmax of the primary tumor for detection of metastases. However, VEGF-D was the best indicator of metastasis in all of those parameters (VEGF-D vs SUVmax; sensitivity 100 vs 100 %; specificity 76 vs 76 %; AUC 0.903 vs 0.835; p < 0.001, respectively). Vascular endothelial growth factor family and its receptors were significantly higher in metastatic CRC patients. VEGF-D was the best indicator of metastasis than all VEGF family, VEGFR-3, and primary tumor SUVmax. VEGF family (A-C-D-E) and VEGFR-3 may help to determine the prognosis and management of CRC.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18AgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRetrospective StudiesROC CurveVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor DVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor DVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3VEGFA protein, humanColorectal cancerFDGPET/CTSUVmaxVascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID26476536
OpenAlexW2105239360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.