Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476449›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

PhytoPath: an integrative resource for plant pathogen genomics.

Helder Pedro, Uma Maheswari, Martin Urban, Alistair George Irvine, Alayne Cuzick, Mark D McDowall, Daniel M Staines, Eugene Kulesha, Kim Elizabeth Hammond-Kosack, Paul Julian Kersey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Apollo: Democratizing genome annotation.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  15. The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Cyberbiosecurity Challenges of Pathogen Genome Databases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helder PedroThe European Molecular Biology Laboratory, The European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7582-1565
Uma MaheswariThe European Molecular Biology Laboratory, The European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SD, UK.
Martin UrbanDepartment of Plant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-9234
Alistair George IrvineDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Alayne CuzickDepartment of Plant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Mark D McDowallThe European Molecular Biology Laboratory, The European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SD, UK.
Daniel M StainesThe European Molecular Biology Laboratory, The European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SD, UK.
Eugene KuleshaThe European Molecular Biology Laboratory, The European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SD, UK.
Kim Elizabeth Hammond-KosackDepartment of Plant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Paul Julian KerseyThe European Molecular Biology Laboratory, The European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SD, UK pkersey@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-800X
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBRothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000488/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I/001077/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I001077/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J/004383/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K020056/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PhytoPath (www.phytopathdb.org) is a resource for genomic and phenotypic data from plant pathogen species, that integrates phenotypic data for genes from PHI-base, an expertly curated catalog of genes with experimentally verified pathogenicity, with the Ensembl tools for data visualization and analysis. The resource is focused on fungi, protists (oomycetes) and bacterial plant pathogens that have genomes that have been sequenced and annotated. Genes with associated PHI-base data can be easily identified across all plant pathogen species using a BioMart-based query tool and visualized in their genomic context on the Ensembl genome browser. The PhytoPath resource contains data for 135 genomic sequences from 87 plant pathogen species, and 1364 genes curated for their role in pathogenicity and as targets for chemical intervention. Support for community annotation of gene models is provided using the WebApollo online gene editor, and we are working with interested communities to improve reference annotation for selected species.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenomicsGenes, BacterialGenes, FungalGenome, BacterialGenome, FungalHost-Pathogen InteractionsOomycetesPhenotypePlant DiseasesSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID26476449
PMCPMC4702788
OpenAlexW1924854984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.