Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476366›Full record

ReviewVaccine2015

Progress with viral vectored malaria vaccines: A multi-stage approach involving "unnatural immunity".

Katie J Ewer, Kailan Sierra-Davidson, Ahmed M Salman, Joseph J Illingworth, Simon J Draper, Sumi Biswas, Adrian V S Hill

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Protein/AS01Cell reports. Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie J EwerThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. Electronic address: katie.ewer@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Kailan Sierra-DavidsonThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK; Vaccine Research Center (VRC), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.
Ahmed M SalmanThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Joseph J IllingworthThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Simon J DraperThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Sumi BiswasThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Adrian V S HillThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
University of Oxford · GBNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral vectors used in heterologous prime-boost regimens are one of very few vaccination approaches that have yielded significant protection against controlled human malaria infections. Recently, protection induced by chimpanzee adenovirus priming and modified vaccinia Ankara boosting using the ME-TRAP insert has been correlated with the induction of potent CD8(+) T cell responses. This regimen has progressed to field studies where efficacy against infection has now been reported. The same vectors have been used pre-clinically to identify preferred protective antigens for use in vaccines against the pre-erythrocytic, blood-stage and mosquito stages of malaria and this work is reviewed here for the first time. Such antigen screening has led to the prioritization of the PfRH5 blood-stage antigen, which showed efficacy against heterologous strain challenge in non-human primates, and vectors encoding this antigen are in clinical trials. This, along with the high transmission-blocking activity of some sexual-stage antigens, illustrates well the capacity of such vectors to induce high titre protective antibodies in addition to potent T cell responses. All of the protective responses induced by these vectors exceed the levels of the same immune responses induced by natural exposure supporting the view that, for subunit vaccines to achieve even partial efficacy in humans, "unnatural immunity" comprising immune responses of very high magnitude will need to be induced.

Indexed as

Adenoviruses, HumanAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunization, SecondaryMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsVaccinationVaccines, SubunitVaccinia virusAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanMalaria VaccinesProtozoan Proteinsthrombospondin-related adhesive protein, protozoanVaccines, SubunitClinical trialsImmunityMalariaViral vectors

Identifiers

PMID26476366
PMCPMC4687526
OpenAlexW2118314915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.