Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476100›Full record

ArticleProteins2015

Partial unfolding and refolding for structure refinement: A unified approach of geometric simulations and molecular dynamics.

Avishek Kumar, Paul Campitelli, M F Thorpe, S Banu Ozkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methods for the Refinement of Protein Structure 3D Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  2. Experimental accuracy in protein structure refinement via molecular dynamics simulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  3. Computational protein structure refinement: Almost there, yet still so far to go.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Avishek KumarDepartment of Physics and Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Paul CampitelliDepartment of Physics and Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
M F ThorpeDepartment of Physics and Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
S Banu OzkanDepartment of Physics and Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Center for the Rational Design of Membrane Protein CrystallographyU54GM094599 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI FROMME, PETRA · 2010 to 2014
$6.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most successful protein structure prediction methods to date have been template-based modeling (TBM) or homology modeling, which predicts protein structure based on experimental structures. These high accuracy predictions sometimes retain structural errors due to incorrect templates or a lack of accurate templates in the case of low sequence similarity, making these structures inadequate in drug-design studies or molecular dynamics simulations. We have developed a new physics based approach to the protein refinement problem by mimicking the mechanism of chaperons that rehabilitate misfolded proteins. The template structure is unfolded by selectively (targeted) pulling on different portions of the protein using the geometric based technique FRODA, and then refolded using hierarchically restrained replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations (hr-REMD). FRODA unfolding is used to create a diverse set of topologies for surveying near native-like structures from a template and to provide a set of persistent contacts to be employed during re-folding. We have tested our approach on 13 previous CASP targets and observed that this method of folding an ensemble of partially unfolded structures, through the hierarchical addition of contact restraints (that is, first local and then nonlocal interactions), leads to a refolding of the structure along with refinement in most cases (12/13). Although this approach yields refined models through advancement in sampling, the task of blind selection of the best refined models still needs to be solved. Overall, the method can be useful for improved sampling for low resolution models where certain of the portions of the structure are incorrectly modeled.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein RefoldingProtein UnfoldingMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsProteinsCASPmolecular dynamicsprotein foldingprotein model refinementreplica exchange

Identifiers

PMID26476100
PMCPMC4856442
OpenAlexW2102971094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.