Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26476006›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2016

Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants in college students: Attitudes, intentions, and vested interest.

Candice D Donaldson, Jason T Siegel, William D Crano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. A Rebuttal-Based Social Norms-Tailored Cannabis Intervention for At-Risk Adolescents.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adolescent Alcohol Use: Protective and Predictive Parent, Peer, and Self-Related Factors.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Candice D DonaldsonDepartment of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th St., Claremont, CA 91711, USA. Electronic address: Candice.Donaldson@cgu.edu.
Jason T SiegelDepartment of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th St., Claremont, CA 91711, USA. Electronic address: Jason.Siegel@cgu.edu.
William D CranoDepartment of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, 150 E. 10th St., Claremont, CA 91711, USA. Electronic address: William.Crano@cgu.edu.

Funding

Understanding and overcoming adolescents resistance to anti-marijuana adsR01DA032698 · NIDA · CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY · PI CRANO, WILLIAM D. · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032698NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA032698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch on vested interest theory (VIT) indicates that the importance and hedonic relevance of attitudes moderates the link between attitudes and attitude-congruent behavior. Though largely untested in prevention research, this relationship may prove crucial in determining the success or failure of prevention efforts. The current study was designed to determine if subjectively perceived vested interest maximized the association between attitudes and intentions regarding the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NUPS).

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted with college student respondents (N=162) using Amazon's MTurk. Participant age ranged from 19 to 49years old. A subsample analysis (n=129) was also conducted with younger respondents, as the typical college student is usually under the age of 30.

resultsFour-step hierarchical regression analysis indicated that both attitudes and perceived vested interest were significantly associated with NUPS behavioral intentions (p<.001). Further, vested interest moderated the relationship between stimulant-related attitudes and usage intentions (p<.001). Attitudes were significantly associated with intentions of moderately and highly vested respondents (p<.001), but not those of participants expressing low levels of perceived vested interest.

conclusionsFindings support the proposition that vested interest may be a useful target for attenuating NUPS. Rather than attempting to weaken positive attitudes toward NUPS, campaigns may prove more successful if designed to convince receivers that NUPS is not in their best interest.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntentionAdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrescription Drug MisuseStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsAttitudesCollege studentsIntentionsPrescription stimulantsVested interest

Identifiers

PMID26476006
PMCPMC5902015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.