Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26475790›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2015

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of FOXP3+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Daqing Jiang, Zhaohua Gao, Zhengang Cai, Meixian Wang, Jianjun He

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The prognostic values of FOXP3Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daqing JiangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Province Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, People's Republic of China. goozh3066@sina.cn.
Zhaohua GaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Province Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, People's Republic of China. gooscigol@163.com.
Zhengang CaiDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, 116011, China. googlegao@163.com.
Meixian WangDepartment of Tumour Pathology and Surgical Oncology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China. lnchwang@126.com.
Jianjun HeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. pleasure95@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic significance of FOXP3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with breast cancer remains controversial. The aims of our meta-analysis are to evaluate its association with clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic significance in patients with breast cancer.

methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database and the Ovid Database were systematically searched (up to April 2015). The meta-analysis was performed using hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) as effect measures. Using the random-effects model, statistical analysis was performed using Stata software, version 12.0.

resultsSeventeen studies including 8277 patients with breast cancer were analyzed. The meta-analysis indicated that the incidence difference of FOXP3+ TILs was significant when comparing the lymph node positive group to negative group (OR = 1.305, 95 % CI [1.071, 1.590]), the histological grade III group to the I-II group (OR = 3.067, 95 % CI [2.288, 4.111]), the ER positive group to the negative group (OR = 0.435, 95 % CI [0.287, 0.660]), the PR positive group to the negative group (OR = 0.493, 95 % CI [0.296, 0.822]), the HER2 positive group to the negative group (OR = 1.896, 95 % CI [1.335, 2.692]), the TNBC group to the non TNBC group (OR = 2.456, 95 % CI [1.801, 3.348]). The detection of FOXP3+ TILs was significantly correlated with the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients (HR = 1.752, 95 % CI [1.188-2.584]) and the overall survival (OS) of patients (HR =1.447, 95 % CI [1.037-2.019]).

conclusionsOur meta-analysis demonstrates that the presence of high levels of FOXP3+ TILs is associated with prognosis for breast cancer patients and predicts lymph node metastasis, hormone receptor and HER-2 status.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26475790
PMCPMC4609059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.