ArticleBMC pediatrics2015
Newborn hearing screening programme in Belgium: a consensus recommendation on risk factors.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Noise or sound management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Congenital toxoplasmosis and auditory disorders: a literature review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical characteristics of asymmetric hearing loss in children from a large pediatric cohort.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Ototoxic and nephrotoxic drugs in neonatal intensive care units: results of a Spanish and Italian survey.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Hearing impairment after asphyxia and neonatal encephalopathy: a Norwegian population-based study.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Downward trends in the global burden of congenital complete hearing loss in children younger than five years from 1990 to 2030.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Audiological Risk Factors, Referral Rates and Dropouts: 9 Years of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in North Sardinia.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- One-Year Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2022Article
- Congenital Deafness and Recent Advances Towards Restoring Hearing Loss.Current protocols · 2021Article
- A splice-site variant (c.3289-1G>T) in OTOF underlies profound hearing loss in a Pakistani kindred.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- Our newborn hearing screening results.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2021Article
- Analysis of the Risk Factors Associated with Hearing Loss of Infants Admitted to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A 13-Year Experience in a University Hospital in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Hearing Disorders in Congenital Toxoplasmosis: A Literature Review.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2018Review
- Hearing loss screening tool (COBRA score) for newborns in primary care setting.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2017Article
- Newborn hearing screening protocol in tuscany region.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2017Article
- Universal newborn hearing screening: methods and results, obstacles, and benefits.Pediatric research · 2017Review
- Congenital syphilis associated with hearing screening failure in southern Brazilian newborns.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the risk factors for hearing loss is essential for designing the Belgian newborn hearing screening programme. Accordingly, they needed to be updated in accordance with current scientific knowledge. This study aimed to update the recommendations for the clinical management and follow-up of newborns with neonatal risk factors of hearing loss for the newborn screening programme in Belgium.
methodsA literature review was performed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system assessment method was used to determine the level of evidence quality and strength of the recommendation for each risk factor. The state of scientific knowledge, levels of evidence quality, and graded recommendations were subsequently assessed using a three-round Delphi consensus process (two online questionnaires and one face-to-face meeting).
resultsCongenital infections (i.e., cytomegalovirus, toxoplasmosis, and syphilis), a family history of hearing loss, consanguinity in (grand)parents, malformation syndromes, and foetal alcohol syndrome presented a 'high' level of evidence quality as neonatal risk factors for hearing loss. Because of the sensitivity of auditory function to bilirubin toxicity, hyperbilirubinaemia was assessed at a 'moderate' level of evidence quality. In contrast, a very low birth weight, low Apgar score, and hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit ranged from 'very low' to 'low' levels, and ototoxic drugs were evidenced as 'very low'. Possible explanations for these 'very low' and 'low' levels include the improved management of these health conditions or treatments, and methodological weaknesses such as confounding effects, which make it difficult to conclude on individual risk factors. In the recommendation statements, the experts emphasised avoiding unidentified neonatal hearing loss and opted to include risk factors for hearing loss even in cases with weak evidence. The panel also highlighted the cumulative effect of risk factors for hearing loss.
conclusionsWe revised the recommendations for the clinical management and follow-up of newborns exhibiting neonatal risk factors for hearing loss on the basis of the aforementioned evidence-based approach and clinical experience from experts. The next step is the implementation of these findings in the Belgian screening programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.