Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26475499›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2016

Inhibition of de novo plaque growth by a new 0.03 % chlorhexidine mouth rinse formulation applying a non-brushing model: a randomized, double blind clinical trial.

Carolina Mor-Reinoso, Andres Pascual, Jose Nart, Marc Quirynen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibiofilm and Anti-Inflammatory Activities ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Article
  5. The antibacterial activity of "Dental research journal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolina Mor-ReinosoDepartment of Periodontology, Hospital General de Catalunya, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, C/ Josep Trueta s/n, C.P. 08195, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
Andres PascualDepartment of Periodontology, Hospital General de Catalunya, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, C/ Josep Trueta s/n, C.P. 08195, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain. pascuallarocca@hotmail.com.
Jose NartDepartment of Periodontology, Hospital General de Catalunya, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, C/ Josep Trueta s/n, C.P. 08195, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc QuirynenDepartments of Oral Health Sciences and Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, University Hospitals & Dentistry Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the plaque inhibitory effect of a new 0.03 % chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) and 0.05 % cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthrinse formulation and to explore patients' experience and side effects after its use. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis short-term, randomized, double blind, parallel, clinical trial enrolled 150 periodontally healthy patients. These volunteers were randomly allocated to one of following mouthrinse groups (n = 50/group): 0.12 % CHX + 0.05 % CPC (Perio-Aid® Treatment alcohol-free), 0.03 % CHX + 0.05 % CPC new test formulation or to the placebo group. Clinical parameters (plaque, gingival, and stain indexes) and microbiological samples were taken at baseline, before supragingival cleaning, and after 4 days of undisturbed plaque growth, rinsing twice/day with one of the mouthrinses.

resultsPlaque reduction was similar for the 0.12 % CHX (-0.52 ± 0.55) and 0.03 % CHX (-0.47 ± 0.49) groups. Both showed significant reductions in plaque accumulation compared to the placebo (p < 0.001). The new formulation had less of a negative impact on taste perception when compared to the 0.12 % CHX solution. The new CHX mouthrinse was also able to control bacterial loads and reduce some periodontopathogens.

conclusionsThis study indicated that the new 0.03 % CHX + 0.05 % CPC formulation exerted clinical efficacy similar to that achieved by an already-marketed 0.12 % CHX + 0.05 % CPC mouthrinse, but with slightly fewer side effects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lower CHX mouthrinse formulations could be effective in the inhibition of plaque regrowth with reduced unpleasant subjective side effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCetylpyridiniumChlorhexidineDental PlaqueDental Plaque IndexDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMouthwashesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCetylpyridiniumChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateMouthwashesAntisepticsCetylpyridinium chlorideChlorhexidine digluconateDental plaqueGingivitisMouthrinse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.