Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26475471›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2015

NeuroTransDB: highly curated and structured transcriptomic metadata for neurodegenerative diseases.

Shweta Bagewadi, Subash Adhikari, Anjani Dhrangadhariya, Afroza Khanam Irin, Christian Ebeling, Aishwarya Alex Namasivayam, Matthew Page, Martin Hofmann-Apitius, Philipp Senger

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multimorbidity among elderly in Bangladesh.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2018
    Article
  4. Benchmarks for measurement of duplicate detection methods in nucleotide databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shweta BagewadiDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, 53113, Bonn, Germany, shweta.bagewadi@scai.fraunhofer.de.
Subash AdhikariDepartment of Chemistry, South University of Science and Technology of China, No 1088, Xueyuan Road, Xili, Shenzhen, China.
Anjani DhrangadhariyaDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Afroza Khanam IrinDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Christian EbelingDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Aishwarya Alex NamasivayamLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 7, avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg and.
Matthew PageTranslational Bioinformatics, UCB Pharma, 216 Bath Rd, Slough SL1 3WE, United Kingdom.
Martin Hofmann-ApitiusDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet Bonn, Bonn-Aachen International Center for Information Technology, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Philipp SengerDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany, shweta.bagewadi@scai.fraunhofer.de philipp.senger@scai.fraunhofer.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases are chronic debilitating conditions, characterized by progressive loss of neurons that represent a significant health care burden as the global elderly population continues to grow. Over the past decade, high-throughput technologies such as the Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays have provided new perspectives into the pathomechanisms underlying neurodegeneration. Public transcriptomic data repositories, namely Gene Expression Omnibus and curated ArrayExpress, enable researchers to conduct integrative meta-analysis; increasing the power to detect differentially regulated genes in disease and explore patterns of gene dysregulation across biologically related studies. The reliability of retrospective, large-scale integrative analyses depends on an appropriate combination of related datasets, in turn requiring detailed meta-annotations capturing the experimental setup. In most cases, we observe huge variation in compliance to defined standards for submitted metadata in public databases. Much of the information to complete, or refine meta-annotations are distributed in the associated publications. For example, tissue preparation or comorbidity information is frequently described in an article's supplementary tables. Several value-added databases have employed additional manual efforts to overcome this limitation. However, none of these databases explicate annotations that distinguish human and animal models in neurodegeneration context. Therefore, adopting a more specific disease focus, in combination with dedicated disease ontologies, will better empower the selection of comparable studies with refined annotations to address the research question at hand. In this article, we describe the detailed development of NeuroTransDB, a manually curated database containing metadata annotations for neurodegenerative studies. The database contains more than 20 dimensions of metadata annotations within 31 mouse, 5 rat and 45 human studies, defined in collaboration with domain disease experts. We elucidate the step-by-step guidelines used to critically prioritize studies from public archives and their metadata curation and discuss the key challenges encountered. Curated metadata for Alzheimer's disease gene expression studies are available for download. Database URL: www.scai.fraunhofer.de/NeuroTransDB.html.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticData CurationGene Expression RegulationNeurodegenerative DiseasesTranscriptomeAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceRats

Identifiers

PMID26475471
PMCPMC4608514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.