Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26475455›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

MicroRNA expression profiles of bovine milk exosomes in response to Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Jiajie Sun, Kshama Aswath, Steven G Schroeder, John D Lippolis, Timothy A Reinhardt, Tad S Sonstegard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Comparative analysis of microRNAs in bovine colostrum and neonatal calf blood.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiajie SunAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA. jiajieking@126.com.
Kshama AswathSchool of Systems Biology, George Mason University, 10900 University Boulevard, Manassas, VA, 20110, USA. kaswath@gmu.edu.
Steven G SchroederAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA. steven.schroeder@ars.usda.gov.
John D LippolisRuminant Diseases and Immunology Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA/ARS, Ames, IA, 50010, USA. john.lippolis@ars.usda.gov.
Timothy A ReinhardtRuminant Diseases and Immunology Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA/ARS, Ames, IA, 50010, USA. tim.reinhardt@ars.usda.gov.
Tad S SonstegardAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA. tad@acceligen.com.
Agricultural Research Service · USNational Animal Disease Center · USGeorge Mason University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMilk exosomes are a rich source of microRNAs (miRNAs) that are protected from degradation. Ingestion of milk and subsequent absorption of miRNAs into recipient cells by endocytosis may play a role in the regulation of neonatal innate and adaptive immunity. In contrast, the miRNA content of milk exosomes may also be indicative of a lactating animal's health; whereby, the presence or absence of specific miRNAs could serve as biomarkers for early detection of bacterial infection that can lead to mastitis. In the present study, we therefore analyzed and compared miRNA expression profiles of milk exosomes from four Holstein cows obtained during mid-lactation prior to and after infection (48 h) of the mammary gland with Staphylococcus aureus.

methodsMilk exosomes, purified from control and S. aureus infected cows, were extracted for RNA. Following preparation indexed libraries from both groups the samples were subjected to next generation sequencing.

resultsNext generation sequencing of eight, unpooled small RNA libraries derived from milk exosomes produced about 60.5 million high-quality, bovine-specific sequence reads for comparison of miRNA expression between treatments. Sequence identity analysis showed the miRNAs make up about 13 % of the average RNA content of these exosomes. Although 417 known bovine miRNAs were identified, miRNAs represented the least diverse class of RNA accounting for only 1 % of all unique sequences. The 20 most prevalent unique sequences within this class accounted for about 90 % of the total miRNA-associated reads across samples. Non-annotated, unique reads provided evidence for another 303 previously unknown bovine miRNAs. Expression analyses found 14 known bovine microRNAs significantly differed in frequency between exosomes from infected and control animals.

conclusionsOur survey of miRNA expression from uninfected milk exosomes and those produced in response to infection provides new and comprehensive information supporting a role for delivery into milk of specific miRNAs involved in immune response. In particular, bta-miR-142-5p, and -223 are potential biomarkers for early detection of bacterial infection of the mammary gland. Additionally, 22 mammary-expressed genes involved in regulation of host immune processes and response to inflammation were identified as potential binding targets of the differentially expressed miRNAs.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleExosomesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMicroRNAsMilkStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26475455
PMCPMC4609085
OpenAlexW2140150226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.