Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26475305›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe).

Cristina Nanni, Elena Zamagni, Annibale Versari, Stephane Chauvie, Andrea Bianchi, Marco Rensi, Marilena Bellò, Ilaria Rambaldi, Andrea Gallamini, Francesca Patriarca and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM guidelines on the use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Application of an artificial intelligence-based tool in [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Chemokine receptor-4 targeted PET/CT withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Interpreting [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  14. Bone marrow SUVmax onImmunologic research · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Optimal acquisition time of [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina NanniNuclear Medicine, AOU Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bld 30, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. cnanni@aosp.bo.it.
Elena ZamagniHematology, AOU Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Annibale VersariNuclear Medicine, S. Maria Nuova Hospital, IRCSS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Stephane ChauvieMedical Physics Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Andrea BianchiNuclear Medicine, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Marco RensiNuclear Medicine, AOU S.Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Marilena BellòNuclear Medicine, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Ilaria RambaldiNuclear Medicine, AOU Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bld 30, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea GallaminiResearch and Innovation Department, A Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France.
Francesca PatriarcaHematologic Clinic, Udine University, Udine, Italy.
Francesca GayMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Barbara GamberiHematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Michele CavoHematology, AOU Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano FantiNuclear Medicine, AOU Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bld 30, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Maria · ITCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FROspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFDG PET/CT is able to detect active disease in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and can be helpful for staging and assessing therapy response, but no standard interpretation criteria have been proposed for the evaluation of FDG PET/CT in MM.

methodsA group of Italian nuclear medicine physicians and haematologists met to propose new visual interpretation criteria to standardize FDG PET/CT evaluation in MM patients (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe; IMPeTUs) and the reproducibility of these criteria was tested. This Italian multicentre protocol was set up as a subprotocol of EMN02, an international prospective multicentre trial of the European Myeloma Network. The criteria were agreed at multidisciplinary consensus meetings. They include a description of the metabolic state of the bone marrow (BM), number and site of focal PET-positive lesions, the number of osteolytic lesions, and the presence and site of extramedullary disease, paramedullary disease and fractures. A visual degree of uptake was defined for the target lesion and extramedullary lesions according to modified Deauville criteria. MM patients who had undergone FDG PET/CT at baseline (PET-0), after induction (PET-AI) and at the end of treatment (PET-EoT) were enrolled. The patients had been prospectively enrolled in EMN02 and their PET scans were a posteriori reinterpreted in a blinded independent central review process managed by WIDEN®. Five expert nuclear medicine physicians scored the scans according to the new criteria. A case was considered read when four out of the five reviewers completed the report. Concordance among reviewers on different metrics was calculated using Krippendorff's alpha coefficient.

resultsA total of 17 consecutive patients were enrolled. On PET-0, the alpha coefficients for the BM score, the score for the hottest focal lesion, the number of focal lesions and the number of lytic lesions were 0.33 and 0.47, 0.40 and 0.32, respectively. On PET-AI, the alpha coefficients were 0.09 and 0.43, 0.22 and 0.21, respectively, and on PET-EoT, the alpha coefficients were 0.07, 0.28, 0.25 and 0.21, respectively. BM was generally difficult to score since grades 2 and 3 are difficult to discriminate. However, since neither of the two grades is related to BM myelomatous involvement, the difference was not clinically relevant. Agreement on focal lesion scores and on the number of focal lesions was good.

conclusionThe new visual criteria for interpreting FDG PET/CT imaging in MM patients, IMPeTUs, were found to be feasible in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Fractures, BoneHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedItalyMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm StagingNuclear MedicineObserver VariationPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18FDG PET/CTIMPeTUsInterpretation criteriaMultiple myelomaStandardization

Identifiers

PMID26475305
OpenAlexW2188032071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.