Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26475138›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Measuring the impact of informal elderly caregiving: a systematic review of tools.

Isabel Mosquera, Itziar Vergara, Isabel Larrañaga, Mónica Machón, María del Río, Carlos Calderón

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04093245 (Supporting the Creation of a LEARNing INteGrated Health System to Mobilize Context-adapted Knowledge With a Wiki Platform to Improve the Transitions of Frail Seniors From From Hospitals and Emergency Departments to the cOMmunity), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04093245 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Supporting the Creation of a LEARNing INteGrated Health System to Mobilize Context-adapted Knowledge With a Wiki Platform to Improve the Transitions of Frail Seniors From From Hospitals and Emergency Departments to the cOMmunity: Phase II

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled4,000ConditionsTransition, Emergencies, Health Care Utilization, FrailtyArmsGEM nurse, pre- and post-hospitalization medication list reconciliation, systematic discharge summaries, medical follow-up appointment, follow-up phone call
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabel MosqueraUnidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza, San Sebastián, Spain.
Itziar VergaraUnidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza, San Sebastián, Spain.
Isabel LarrañagaCentro de Investigación en Cronicidad, KRONIKGUNE, Bilbao, Spain.
Mónica MachónUnidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza, San Sebastián, Spain. monica.machonsobrado@osakidetza.eus.
María del RíoEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Granada, Spain.
Carlos CalderónUnidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza, San Sebastián, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo classify and identify the main characteristics of the tools used in practice to assess the impact of elderly caregiving on the informal carers' life.

methodsA systematic review of literature was performed searching in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, IBECS, LILACS, SiiS, SSCI and Cochrane Library from 2009 to 2013 in English, Spanish, Portuguese and French, and in reference lists of included papers.

resultsThe review included 79 studies, among them several in languages other than English. Their inclusion increased the variety of identified tools to measure this impact (n = 93) and allowed a wider analysis of their geographical use. While confirming their overlapping nature, instruments were classified according to the degree of integration of dimensions they evaluated and their specificity to the caregiving process: caregiver burden (n = 20), quality of life and well-being (n = 11), management and coping (n = 21), emotional and mental health (n = 29), psychosocial impact (n = 10), physical health and healthy habits (n = 2), and other measures. A high use in practice of tools not validated yet and not caregiver-specific was identified.

conclusionsThe great variety and characteristics of instruments identified in this review confirm the complexity and multidimensionality of the effects of elderly caregiving on the informal carer's life and explain the difficulties to assess these effects in practice. According to the classification provided, caregiver burden and emotional and mental health are the most evaluated dimensions. However, further work is required to develop integrated and caregiving focused procedures that can appraise this complexity across different countries and cultures.

Indexed as

CaregiversQuality Indicators, Health CareAgedFemaleGeriatric NursingHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedQuality of LifeCaregiversElderlyHealthQuality of LifeTool

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.