Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26474764›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2016

The Interesting Case of Acyclovir Delivered Using Chitosan in Humans: Is it a Drug Issue or Formulation Issue?

Nuggehally R Srinivas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nuggehally R SrinivasSuramus Bio, Drug Development, J.P. Nagar I Phase, Bangalore, 560078, Karnataka, India. srini.suramus@yahoo.com.
Sri Kalabyraveshwara Swamy Ayurvedic Medical College, Hospital and Research Center · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAttempts to formulate acyclovir to improve its bioavailability and reduce the frequency of dosing from the present q4h have not materialized. DISCUSSION: It was thought that an approach using permeability enhancer such as chitosan may impart improved absorption profile to acyclovir; however, the recently published pharmacokinetic data suggested otherwise. The lack of promise of chitosan formulation was attributed to the muco-adhesive properties of chitosan to hold off acyclovir and preventing its transport across the gastrointestinal tract. However, the above hypothesis was refuted by another published human pharmacokinetic study of fexofenadine formulated with chitosan formulation - in this work it was unambiguously shown that chitosan helped in enhanced absorption of fexofenadine which is a well-known Pgp substrate. If one examines the pharmacokinetic disposition of acyclovir, it is clear that renal elimination is so rapid necessitating frequent dosing of acyclovir. In summary, the ability of chitosan based formulations to aid in the oral absorption of drugs may be drug dependent as enumerated by data obtained from acyclovir and fexofenadine. While chitosan favourably improved the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, acyclovir may not be ideal for chitosan type of formulation.

conclusionThe choice of the drug and the formulation type intended to deliver the drug need to be made in a diligent and pragmatic fashion.

Indexed as

AcyclovirAdhesivenessAdministration, OralBiological AvailabilityChemistry, PharmaceuticalChitosanDrug Delivery SystemsExcipientsHumansIntestinal AbsorptionPermeabilityTerfenadineAcyclovirChitosanExcipientsfexofenadineTerfenadineabsorptionacyclovirchitosanpharmacokineticsrenal excretion

Identifiers

PMID26474764
OpenAlexW2187458959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.