ArticlePharmaceutical research2016
The Interesting Case of Acyclovir Delivered Using Chitosan in Humans: Is it a Drug Issue or Formulation Issue?
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Intestinal Absorption Study: Challenges and Absorption Enhancement Strategies in Improving Oral Drug Delivery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAttempts to formulate acyclovir to improve its bioavailability and reduce the frequency of dosing from the present q4h have not materialized. DISCUSSION: It was thought that an approach using permeability enhancer such as chitosan may impart improved absorption profile to acyclovir; however, the recently published pharmacokinetic data suggested otherwise. The lack of promise of chitosan formulation was attributed to the muco-adhesive properties of chitosan to hold off acyclovir and preventing its transport across the gastrointestinal tract. However, the above hypothesis was refuted by another published human pharmacokinetic study of fexofenadine formulated with chitosan formulation - in this work it was unambiguously shown that chitosan helped in enhanced absorption of fexofenadine which is a well-known Pgp substrate. If one examines the pharmacokinetic disposition of acyclovir, it is clear that renal elimination is so rapid necessitating frequent dosing of acyclovir. In summary, the ability of chitosan based formulations to aid in the oral absorption of drugs may be drug dependent as enumerated by data obtained from acyclovir and fexofenadine. While chitosan favourably improved the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, acyclovir may not be ideal for chitosan type of formulation.
conclusionThe choice of the drug and the formulation type intended to deliver the drug need to be made in a diligent and pragmatic fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.