Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26474521›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2015

Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial.

Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Lindsay A Renfro, Oliver S Chow, Qian Shi, Xiomara W Carrero, Patricio B Lynn, Charles R Thomas, Emily Chan, Peter A Cataldo, Jorge E Marcet and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00114231 (A Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy and Local Excision for uT2uN0 Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00114231 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy and Local Excision for uT2uN0 Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan2006 to 2014Enrolled90ConditionsColorectal CancerArmscapecitabine, oxaliplatin, neoadjuvant therapy, radiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 418 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Multicenter Prospective Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Dose-Dense Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Can weBMJ open · 2017
    Trial
  20. Trial

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Julio Garcia-AguilarMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: garciaaj@mskcc.org.
Lindsay A RenfroMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Oliver S ChowMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Qian ShiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Xiomara W CarreroMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Patricio B LynnMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Charles R ThomasOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Emily ChanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Peter A CataldoUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Jorge E MarcetTampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
David S MedichUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Craig S JohnsonSt Francis Hospital, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Samuel C OommenJohn Muir Medical Center, Concord, CA, USA.
Bruce G WolffMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alessio PigazziUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Shane M McNevinHoly Family Hospital, Spokane, WA, USA.
Roger K PonsHialeah Hospital, Hialeah, FL, USA.
Ronald BledayBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohn Muir Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USSt. Francis Hospital · USTampa General Hospital · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Vermont · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ONCOLOGY TRIALS GROUPU10CA076001 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1998 to 2013
$62.1M
Organ Preservation in Rectal AdenocarcinomaR01CA182551 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI GARCIA-AGUILAR, JULIO · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA182551NCI NIH HHS U10 CA076001NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA 76001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal excision is an organ-preserving treatment alternative to transabdominal resection for patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, local excision alone is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and inferior survival compared with transabdominal rectal resection. We investigated the oncological and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision for patients with stage T2N0 rectal cancer.

methodsWe did a multi-institutional, single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial of patients with clinically staged T2N0 distal rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy at 26 American College of Surgeons Oncology Group institutions. Patients with clinical T2N0 rectal adenocarcinoma staged by endorectal ultrasound or endorectal coil MRI, measuring less than 4 cm in greatest diameter, involving less than 40% of the circumference of the rectum, located within 8 cm of the anal verge, and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of at least 2 were included in the study. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of capecitabine (original dose 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and 22-35), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5), and radiation (5 days a week at 1·8 Gy per day for 5 weeks to a dose of 45 Gy, followed by a boost of 9 Gy, for a total dose of 54 Gy) followed by local excision. Because of adverse events during chemoradiotherapy, the dose of capecitabine was reduced to 725 mg/m(2) twice-daily, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks, and the boost of radiation was reduced to 5·4 Gy, for a total dose of 50·4 Gy. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival for all eligible patients (intention-to-treat population) and for patients who completed chemotherapy and radiation, and had ypT0, ypT1, or ypT2 tumours, and negative resection margins (per-protocol group). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00114231.

findingsBetween May 25, 2006, and Oct 22, 2009, 79 eligible patients were recruited to the trial and started neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Two patients had no surgery and one had a total mesorectal excision. Four additional patients completed protocol treatment, but one had a positive margin and three had ypT3 tumours. Thus, the per-protocol population consisted of 72 patients. Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 46-63) for all patients. The estimated 3-year disease-free survival for the intention-to-treat group was 88·2% (95% CI 81·3-95·8), and for the per-protocol group was 86·9% (79·3-95·3). Of 79 eligible patients, 23 (29%) had grade 3 gastrointestinal adverse events, 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 pain, and 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 haematological adverse events during chemoradiation. Of the 77 patients who had surgery, six (8%) had grade 3 pain, three (4%) had grade 3-4 haemorrhage, and three (4%) had gastrointestinal adverse events.

interpretationAlthough the observed 3-year disease free survival was not as high as anticipated, our data suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision might be considered as an organ-preserving alternative in carefully selected patients with clinically staged T2N0 tumours who refuse, or are not candidates for, transabdominal resection.

fundingNational Cancer Institute and Sanofi-Aventis.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyOrgan Sparing TreatmentsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26474521
PMCPMC4984260
OpenAlexW1864574802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.