Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26474401›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

A Single-Dose Intra-Articular Morphine plus Bupivacaine versus Morphine Alone following Knee Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dong-Xing Xie, Chao Zeng, Yi-Lun Wang, Yu-Sheng Li, Jie Wei, Hui Li, Tuo Yang, Tu-Bao Yang, Guang-Hua Lei

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Chondrotoxicity of Intra-Articular Injection Treatment: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Effect of species, concentration and volume of local anesthetics on intervertebral disk degeneration in rats with discoblock.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Xing XieDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Chao ZengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Yi-Lun WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Yu-Sheng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Jie WeiDepartment of epidemiology and health statistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Tuo YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Tu-Bao YangDepartment of epidemiology and health statistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Guang-Hua LeiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Xiangya Hospital Central South University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single-dose intra-articular morphine plus bupivacaine versus morphine alone in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.

methodsRandomized controlled trials comparing a combination of morphine and bupivacaine with morphine alone injected intra-articularly in the management of pain after knee arthrocopic surgery were retrieved (up to August 10, 2014) from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases. The weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using RevMan statistical software.

resultsThirteen randomized controlled trials were included. Statistically significant differences were observed with regard to the VAS values during the immediate period (0-2h) (WMD -1.16; 95% CI -2.01 to -0.31; p = 0.007) and the time to first request for rescue analgesia (WMD = 2.05; 95% CI 0.19 to 3.92; p = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in the VAS pain score during the early period (2-6h) (WMD -0.36; 95% CI -1.13 to 0.41; p = 0.35), the late period (6-48h) (WMD 0.11; 95% CI -0.40 to 0.63; p = 0.67), and the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.05; p = 0.10). In addition, systematic review showed that intra-articular morphine plus bupivacaine would not increase the incidence of adverse effects compared with morphine alone.

conclusionThe present study suggested that the administration of single-dose intra-articular morphine plus bupivacaine provided better pain relief during the immediate period (0-2h), and lengthened the time interval before the first request for analgesic rescue without increasing the short-term side effects when compared with morphine alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Indexed as

Knee JointArthroscopyBupivacaineHumansKneeMorphinePain ManagementBupivacaineMorphine

Identifiers

PMID26474401
PMCPMC4608597
OpenAlexW2275543695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.