Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26474394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Evaluation of the Broad-Range PCR/ESI-MS Technology in Blood Specimens for the Molecular Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections.

Elena Jordana-Lluch, Montserrat Giménez, M Dolores Quesada, Belén Rivaya, Clara Marcó, M Jesús Domínguez, Fernando Arméstar, Elisa Martró, Vicente Ausina

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Validation of an Isothermal Amplification Platform for Microbial Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Detection in Blood: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Rapid Detection of Methicillin-ResistantDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. How small modifications in laboratory workflow of blood cultures can have a significant impact on time to results.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elena Jordana-LluchMicrobiology Service, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain; CIBER in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Health Sciences Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain.
Montserrat GiménezMicrobiology Service, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain; CIBER in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
M Dolores QuesadaMicrobiology Service, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.
Belén RivayaMicrobiology Service, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.
Clara MarcóMicrobiology Service, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.
M Jesús DomínguezEmergency Room, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain.
Fernando ArméstarIntensive Care Unit, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain.
Elisa MartróMicrobiology Service, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain; Health Sciences Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain; CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Vicente AusinaMicrobiology Service, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Badalona, Spain; CIBER in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Health Sciences Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid identification of the etiological agent in bloodstream infections is of vital importance for the early administration of the most appropriate antibiotic therapy. Molecular methods may offer an advantage to current culture-based microbiological diagnosis. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of IRIDICA, a platform based on universal genetic amplification followed by mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) for the molecular diagnosis of sepsis-related pathogens directly from the patient's blood.

methodsA total of 410 whole blood specimens from patients admitted to Emergency Room (ER) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with clinical suspicion of sepsis were tested with the IRIDICA BAC BSI Assay (broad identification of bacteria and Candida spp.). Microorganisms grown in culture and detected by IRIDICA were compared considering blood culture as gold standard. When discrepancies were found, clinical records and results from other cultures were taken into consideration (clinical infection criterion).

resultsThe overall positive and negative agreement of IRIDICA with blood culture in the analysis by specimen was 74.8% and 78.6%, respectively, rising to 76.9% and 87.2% respectively, when compared with the clinical infection criterion. Interestingly, IRIDICA detected 41 clinically significant microorganisms missed by culture, most of them from patients under antimicrobial treatment. Of special interest were the detections of one Mycoplasma hominis and two Mycobacterium simiae in immunocompromised patients. When ICU patients were analyzed separately, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values compared with blood culture were 83.3%, 78.6%, 33.9% and 97.3% respectively, and 90.5%, 87.2%, 64.4% and 97.3% respectively, in comparison with the clinical infection criterion.

conclusionsIRIDICA is a promising technology that offers an early and reliable identification of a wide variety of pathogens directly from the patient's blood within 6h, which brings the opportunity to improve management of septic patients, especially for those critically ill admitted to the ICU.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBloodDrug Resistance, BacterialEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26474394
PMCPMC4608784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.