Trial reportPloS one2015
Pain Intensity Recognition Rates via Biopotential Feature Patterns with Support Vector Machines.
Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain assessment using physiological responses/markers in different types of pain: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Application of Intelligent Neonatal Pain Assessment Tools Based on Multimodal Data Fusion: A Systematic Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Zero-shot multimodal pain estimation via synthetic pain simulation and domain-invariant learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Influence of Pre-Existing Pain on the Body's Response to External Pain Stimuli: Experimental Study.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- The need for epistemic humility in AI-assisted pain assessment.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnostic Processes and Comprehensive Multimodal Models in Pain Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Article
- A hybrid linear discriminant analysis and genetic algorithm to create a linear model of aging when performing motor tasks through inertial sensors positioned on the hand and forearm.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- A systematic review of neurophysiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- The use of electrodermal activity in pulpal diagnosis and dental pain assessment.International endodontic journal · 2023Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Pain Research: Understanding the Role of Electrodermal Activity for Automated Pain Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Pain Assessment: Research Methods and Perspectives.Pain research & management · 2023Review
- The impact of analgesic on EMG and other biosignals in a postoperative setting.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Personalized Deep Bi-LSTM RNN Based Model for Pain Intensity Classification Using EDA Signal.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning in Pain Medicine: An Up-To-Date Systematic Review.Pain and therapy · 2021Review
- Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Physiological Signals for Heat-Based Pain Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinically used methods of pain diagnosis do not allow for objective and robust measurement, and physicians must rely on the patient's report on the pain sensation. Verbal scales, visual analog scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) count among the most common tools, which are restricted to patients with normal mental abilities. There also exist instruments for pain assessment in people with verbal and / or cognitive impairments and instruments for pain assessment in people who are sedated and automated ventilated. However, all these diagnostic methods either have limited reliability and validity or are very time-consuming. In contrast, biopotentials can be automatically analyzed with machine learning algorithms to provide a surrogate measure of pain intensity.
methodsIn this context, we created a database of biopotentials to advance an automated pain recognition system, determine its theoretical testing quality, and optimize its performance. Eighty-five participants were subjected to painful heat stimuli (baseline, pain threshold, two intermediate thresholds, and pain tolerance threshold) under controlled conditions and the signals of electromyography, skin conductance level, and electrocardiography were collected. A total of 159 features were extracted from the mathematical groupings of amplitude, frequency, stationarity, entropy, linearity, variability, and similarity.
resultsWe achieved classification rates of 90.94% for baseline vs. pain tolerance threshold and 79.29% for baseline vs. pain threshold. The most selected pain features stemmed from the amplitude and similarity group and were derived from facial electromyography.
conclusionThe machine learning measurement of pain in patients could provide valuable information for a clinical team and thus support the treatment assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.