ArticleProteins2016
Some of the most interesting CASP11 targets through the eyes of their authors.
Article in Proteins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- RNA target highlights in CASP15: Evaluation of predicted models by structure providers.Proteins · 2023Article
- Role of environmental specificity in CASP results.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Computational models in the service of X-ray and cryo-electron microscopy structure determination.Proteins · 2021Article
- The DUF328 family member YaaA is a DNA-binding protein with a novel fold.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Biological and functional relevance of CASP predictions.Proteins · 2018Article
- Article
- Crystal structure of NucB, a biofilm-degrading endonuclease.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Predictive and Experimental Approaches for Elucidating Protein-Protein Interactions and Quaternary Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Article
- KScons: a Bayesian approach for protein residue contact prediction using the knob-socket model of protein tertiary structure.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Blind protein structure prediction using accelerated free-energy simulations.Science advances · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) experiment would not have been possible without the prediction targets provided by the experimental structural biology community. In this article, selected crystallographers providing targets for the CASP11 experiment discuss the functional and biological significance of the target proteins, highlight their most interesting structural features, and assess whether these features were correctly reproduced in the predictions submitted to CASP11. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):34-50. © 2015 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.