Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26473938›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2015

In Vivo Electrochemical Analysis of a PEDOT/MWCNT Neural Electrode Coating.

Nicolas A Alba, Zhanhong J Du, Kasey A Catt, Takashi D Y Kozai, X Tracy Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Applications of 2D Nanomaterials in Neural Interface.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolas A AlbaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 5056 Biomedical Science Tower 3, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. nicolasaalba@gmail.com.
Zhanhong J DuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 5056 Biomedical Science Tower 3, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. duzhanhong@gmail.com.
Kasey A CattDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 5056 Biomedical Science Tower 3, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. kaseycatt@gmail.com.
Takashi D Y KozaiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 5056 Biomedical Science Tower 3, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. tdk18@pitt.edu.
X Tracy CuiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 5056 Biomedical Science Tower 3, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. xic11@pitt.edu.

Funding

Improving chronic neural recording performance through biomaterial strategiesR01NS062019 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CUI, XINYAN TRACY · 2008 to 2018
$4.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural electrodes hold tremendous potential for improving understanding of brain function and restoring lost neurological functions. Multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and dexamethasone (Dex)-doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) coatings have shown promise to improve chronic neural electrode performance. Here, we employ electrochemical techniques to characterize the coating in vivo. Coated and uncoated electrode arrays were implanted into rat visual cortex and subjected to daily cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for 11 days. Coated electrodes experienced a significant decrease in 1 kHz impedance within the first two days of implantation followed by an increase between days 4 and 7. Equivalent circuit analysis showed that the impedance increase is the result of surface capacitance reduction, likely due to protein and cellular processes encapsulating the porous coating. Coating's charge storage capacity remained consistently higher than uncoated electrodes, demonstrating its in vivo electrochemical stability. To decouple the PEDOT/MWCNT material property changes from the tissue response, in vitro characterization was conducted by soaking the coated electrodes in PBS for 11 days. Some coated electrodes exhibited steady impedance while others exhibiting large increases associated with large decreases in charge storage capacity suggesting delamination in PBS. This was not observed in vivo, as scanning electron microscopy of explants verified the integrity of the coating with no sign of delamination or cracking. Despite the impedance increase, coated electrodes successfully recorded neural activity throughout the implantation period.

Indexed as

Neural ProsthesesAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDexamethasoneElectric ImpedanceElectrochemical TechniquesMaleMicroelectrodesNanotubes, CarbonPolymersRatsRats, Long-EvansVisual CortexAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDexamethasoneNanotubes, Carbonpoly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)Polymerscontrolled drug releasedrug releaseelectroactive polymerinterfacenanocompositeneural prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID26473938
PMCPMC4697137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.