Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26473931›Full record

ArticleCells2015

Active Nuclear Import of Membrane Proteins Revisited.

Justyna K Laba, Anton Steen, Petra Popken, Alina Chernova, Bert Poolman, Liesbeth M Veenhoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Functions of intrinsic disorder in transmembrane proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Justyna K LabaEuropean Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands. b.poolman@rug.nl.
Anton SteenEuropean Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands. a.steen@umcg.nl.
Petra PopkenEuropean Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands. b.poolman@rug.nl.
Alina ChernovaEuropean Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands. alin.chernova@gmail.com.
Bert PoolmanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands. b.poolman@rug.nl.
Liesbeth M VeenhoffEuropean Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen 9713 AV, The Netherlands. l.m.veenhoff@rug.nl.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is poorly understood how membrane proteins destined for the inner nuclear membrane pass the crowded environment of the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC). For the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins Src1/Heh1 and Heh2, a transport mechanism was proposed where the transmembrane domains diffuse through the membrane while the extralumenal domains encoding a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and intrinsically disordered linker (L) are accompanied by transport factors and travel through the NPC. Here, we validate the proposed mechanism and explore and discuss alternative interpretations of the data. First, to disprove an interpretation where the membrane proteins become membrane embedded only after nuclear import, we present biochemical and localization data to support that the previously used, as well as newly designed reporter proteins are membrane-embedded irrespective of the presence of the sorting signals, the specific transmembrane domain (multipass or tail anchored), independent of GET, and also under conditions that the proteins are trapped in the NPC. Second, using the recently established size limit for passive diffusion of membrane proteins in yeast, and using an improved assay, we confirm active import of polytopic membrane protein with extralumenal soluble domains larger than those that can pass by diffusion on similar timescales. This reinforces that NLS-L dependent active transport is distinct from passive diffusion. Thirdly, we revisit the proposed route through the center of the NPC and conclude that the previously used trapping assay is, unfortunately, poorly suited to address the route through the NPC, and the route thus remains unresolved. Apart from the uncertainty about the route through the NPC, the data confirm active, transport factor dependent, nuclear transport of membrane-embedded mono- and polytopic membrane proteins in baker's yeast.

Indexed as

inner nuclear membranenuclear envelopenuclear pore complexnuclear transport

Identifiers

PMID26473931
PMCPMC4695851
OpenAlexW2117652288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.