Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26473909›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories.

Donald G MacKay, Laura W Johnson, Elizabeth R Graham, Deborah M Burke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donald G MacKayDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. mackay@ucla.edu.
Laura W JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. laurajohnson@ucla.edu.
Elizabeth R GrahamDepartment of Psychology, Pomona College and Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA. elizabeth.graham@pomona.edu.
Deborah M BurkeDepartment of Psychology, Pomona College and Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA. dburke@pomona.edu.

Funding

MEMORY AND LANGUAGE IN OLD AGER37AG008835 · NIA · POMONA COLLEGE · PI BURKE, DEBORAH M · 1999 to 2008
$2.7M
MEMORY AND LANGUAGE IN OLD AGER01AG008835 · NIA · POMONA COLLEGE · PI BURKE, DEBORAH M · 1990 to 1998
–
NIA NIH HHS AG08835NIA NIH HHS R37 AG008835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does aging impact relations between emotion, memory, and attention? To address this question, young and older adults named the font colors of taboo and neutral words, some of which recurred in the same font color or screen location throughout two color-naming experiments. The results indicated longer color-naming response times (RTs) for taboo than neutral base-words (taboo Stroop interference); better incidental recognition of colors and locations consistently associated with taboo versus neutral words (taboo context-memory enhancement); and greater speed-up in color-naming RTs with repetition of color-consistent than color-inconsistent taboo words, but no analogous speed-up with repetition of location-consistent or location-inconsistent taboo words (the consistency type by repetition interaction for taboo words). All three phenomena remained constant with aging, consistent with the transmission deficit hypothesis and binding theory, where familiar emotional words trigger age-invariant reactions for prioritizing the binding of contextual features to the source of emotion. Binding theory also accurately predicted the interaction between consistency type and repetition for taboo words. However, one or more aspects of these phenomena failed to support the inhibition deficit hypothesis, resource capacity theory, or socio-emotional selectivity theory. We conclude that binding theory warrants further test in a range of paradigms, and that relations between aging and emotion, memory, and attention may depend on whether the task and stimuli trigger fast-reaction, involuntary binding processes, as in the taboo Stroop paradigm.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAgingAttentionColorEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMemoryReaction TimeTabooYoung Adultagingattentionbinding theoryemotioninhibition deficit theorymemoryresource capacity theorysocio-emotional selectivity theorytaboo Stroop tasktransmission deficit hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID26473909
PMCPMC4627001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.