Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26473742›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2016

Opioid Analgesics and the Risk of Serious Infections Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Self-Controlled Case Series Study.

Andrew D Wiese, Marie R Griffin, C Michael Stein, Edward F Mitchel, Carlos G Grijalva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D WieseVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Marie R GriffinVanderbilt University Medical Center, Mid-South Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville Campus, Nashville, Tennessee.
C Michael SteinVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Edward F MitchelVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Carlos G GrijalvaVanderbilt University Medical Center, Mid-South Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville Campus, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Multidisciplinary Clinical Research CenterP60AR056116 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STEIN, CHARLES M. · 2008 to 2012
$6.2M
Opioid selection and the risk of serious infections in older adultsR01AG043471 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRIJALVA, CARLOS G · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
Opiod Analgesics and the Risk of Serious Infections in SeniorsR03AG042981 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GRIJALVA, CARLOS G · 2012 to 2013
$152k
NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR056116NIAMS NIH HHS P60-AR-056116NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043471NIA NIH HHS R01-AG-043471-01A1NIA NIH HHS R03 AG042981NIA NIH HHS R03-AG-042981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAnimal studies and in vitro human studies suggest that certain opioid analgesics impair crucial immune functions. This study was undertaken to determine whether opioid use is associated with increased risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsWe conducted a self-controlled case series analysis on a retrospective cohort of 13,796 patients with RA enrolled in Tennessee Medicaid in 1995-2009. Within-person comparisons of the risk of hospitalization for serious infection during periods of opioid use versus non-use were performed using conditional Poisson regression. Fixed confounders were accounted for by design; time-varying confounders included age and use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticoids, and proton-pump inhibitors. In additional analyses, risks associated with new opioid use, use of opioids known to have immunosuppressive properties, use of long-acting opioids, and different opioid dosages were assessed. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for potential protopathic bias and confounding by indication.

resultsAmong 1,790 patients with RA who had at least 1 hospitalization for serious infection, the adjusted incidence rate of serious infection was higher during periods of current opioid use compared to non-use, with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.39 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.19-1.62). The incidence rate was also higher during periods of long-acting opioid use, immunosuppressive opioid use, and new opioid use compared to non-use (IRR 2.01 [95% CI 1.52-2.66], IRR 1.72 [95% CI 1.33-2.23], and IRR 2.38 [95% CI 1.65-3.42], respectively). Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings.

conclusionIn within-person comparisons of patients with RA, opioid use was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for serious infection.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCodeineCohort StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsDextropropoxypheneHospitalizationHumansHydrocodoneImmunosuppressive AgentsIncidenceInfectionsMedicaidAnalgesics, OpioidAntirheumatic AgentsCodeineDelayed-Action PreparationsDextropropoxypheneHydrocodoneImmunosuppressive AgentsMorphineOxycodone

Identifiers

PMID26473742
PMCPMC4728045
OpenAlexW2098796003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.