Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26473599›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Health Policy Attitudes of American Medical Students: A Pilot Survey.

Robert A Dugger, Abdulrahman M El-Sayed, Catherine Messina, Richard Bronson, Sandro Galea

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Today's Students, Tomorrow's Physicians: Opinions on Enacted and Prospective Health Care Policies.International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation · 2020
    Article
  5. Looking to the Future: Medical Students' Views on Health Care Reform and Professional Responsibility.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert A DuggerColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America; Hofstra North Shore Long Island Jewish School of Medicine, Queens, New York, United States of America.
Abdulrahman M El-SayedColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States of America.
Catherine MessinaStony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Richard BronsonStony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Sandro GaleaColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelatively little is known about American medical student's attitudes toward caring for the uninsured, limiting physician reimbursement and the role of cost-effectiveness data in medical decision-making. We assessed American medical student's attitudes regarding these topics as well as demographic predictors of those attitudes, and compared them to practicing physicians. METHODS AND

findingsA survey instrument was explicitly designed to compare medical student attitudes with those previously reported by physicians. Between December 1st 2010 and March 27th 2011 survey responses were collected from more than 2% of the total estimated 2010-2011 US medical student population enrolled at 111 of 159 accredited US medical schools within the 50 United States (n = 2414 of possible 98197). Medical students were more likely to object to reimbursement cuts, and more likely to object to the use of cost effectiveness data in medical decision making than current physicians according to the literature. Specialty preference, political persuasion, and medical student debt were significant predictors of health policy attitudes. Medical students with anticipated debt in excess of $200,000 were significantly less willing to favor limiting reimbursement to improve patient access (OR: 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.89]), and significantly more likely to object to using cost effectiveness data to limit treatments (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60) when compared to respondents with anticipated debt less than $200,000.

conclusionsWhen compared to physicians in the literature, future physicians may be less willing to favor cuts to physician reimbursements and may be more likely to object to the use of cost effectiveness data. Political orientation, specialty preference and anticipated debt may be important predictors of health policy attitudes among medical students. Early career medical providers with primary care ambitions and those who anticipate less debt may be more likely to support healthcare cost containment.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMedically UninsuredPilot ProjectsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Students, MedicalUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26473599
PMCPMC4608797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.