ArticleFamily medicine2015
Exploring Residents' Interactions With Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Encounters.
Article in Family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic health records and clinical documentation in medical residency programs: preparing residents to become master clinicians.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- How Do Patients Want Us to Use the Computer During Medical Encounters?-A Discrete Choice Experiment Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Why Residency Programs Should Not Ignore the Electronic Heath Record after Adoption.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2019Article
- What factors influence the use of electronic health records during the first 10 minutes of the clinical encounter?International journal of general medicine · 2018Article
- Proficiency of First-Year Podiatric Medical Residents in the Use of Electronic Medical Records.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2018Article
- Residents' Insights and Ideas about Screen-Sharing in Primary Care Clinics.Applied clinical informatics · 2017Article
- Learning to use electronic health records: can we stay patient-centered? A pre-post intervention study with family medicine residents.BMC family practice · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOur objective was to explore and compare residents' interaction with electronic health records during primary care encounters and whether those behaviors differ by residency year level.
methodsA field study was conducted in which 38 patient visits with 12 family medicine resident physicians were observed and video recorded in two primary care clinics under the umbrella of a university-based department of family medicine. Videos were then coded for gaze behaviors in which patients' and physicians' gazes at electronic health records and at each other were coded using a pre-established objective coding scheme.
resultsThird-year residents spent the greatest percentage of visit time looking at EHR screens when compared to first- and second-year residents. Third-year residents also spent significantly more time typing or inputting information into the records during the clinical visit when compared to first- and second-year residents.
conclusionsThis study illustrated that patterns for using the EHR and interacting with patients may change over time for residents. These changes may be due to increased EHR proficiency or increased workload that incentivizes using the EHR to retrieve information and to complete charting in front of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26473566PMC6716379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.