ArticleJournal of vision2015
Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.
Article in Journal of vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- In search of exogenous feature-based attention.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Trial
- Perceptual resolution of ambiguity: A divisive normalization account for both interocular color grouping and difference enhancement.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Linear and nonlinear effects of Spatial and Temporal attention: human data and drift diffusion model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Attention Alters Population Spatial Frequency Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Task demand mediates the interaction of spatial and temporal attention.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The time course of feature-selective attention inside and outside the focus of spatial attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Engaging in word recognition elicits highly specific modulations in visual cortex.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Microsaccades as a long-term oculomotor correlate in visual perceptual learning.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Space- and feature-based attention operate both independently and interactively within latent components of perceptual decision making.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Attention to visual motion suppresses neuronal and behavioral sensitivity in nearby feature space.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Updating the dual-mechanism model for cross-sensory attentional spreading: The influence of space-based visual selective attention.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Feature-based attention enables robust, long-lasting location transfer in human perceptual learning.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Differential impact of exogenous and endogenous attention on the contrast sensitivity function across eccentricity.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Limited interactions between space- and feature-based attention in visually sparse displays.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Parallel attentional facilitation of features and objects in early visual cortex.Psychophysiology · 2020Article
- Feature-based attention potentiates recovery of fine direction discrimination in cortically blind patients.Neuropsychologia · 2019Article
- The possibility to make choices modulates feature-based effects of reward.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.eLife · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinct attentional mechanisms enhance the sensory processing of visual stimuli that appear at task-relevant locations and have task-relevant features. We used a combination of psychophysics and computational modeling to investigate how these two types of attention--spatial and feature based--interact to modulate sensitivity when combined in one task. Observers monitored overlapping groups of dots for a target change in color saturation, which they had to localize as being in the upper or lower visual hemifield. Pre-cues indicated the target's most likely location (left/right), color (red/green), or both location and color. We measured sensitivity (d') for every combination of the location cue and the color cue, each of which could be valid, neutral, or invalid. When three competing saturation changes occurred simultaneously with the target change, there was a clear interaction: The spatial cueing effect was strongest for the cued color, and the color cueing effect was strongest at the cued location. In a second experiment, only the target dot group changed saturation, such that stimulus competition was low. The resulting cueing effects were statistically independent and additive: The color cueing effect was equally strong at attended and unattended locations. We account for these data with a computational model in which spatial and feature-based attention independently modulate the gain of sensory responses, consistent with measurements of cortical activity. Multiple responses then compete via divisive normalization. Sufficient competition creates interactions between the two cueing effects, although the attentional systems are themselves independent. This model helps reconcile seemingly disparate behavioral and physiological findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.