ReviewClinical endoscopy2015
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linked Color Imaging Can Improve Detection Rate of Early Gastric Cancer in a High-Risk Population: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Trial
- From cabinet to PlasmaBag: validating mobile endoscope storage with plasma technology.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Digestive Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Bacterial Pathogens, Host Susceptibility, and the Impact of Viral Hepatitis.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Streamlining Endoscopy Cleaning: The Impact of a New Detergent on Time and Water Use.Journal of market access & health policy · 2025Article
- UV-C side-emitting optical fiber-based disinfection: a promising approach for infection control in tight channels.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Effect of a Proton Pump Inhibitor on the Duodenum Microbiome of Gastric Ulcer Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists approaching oropharyngeal dysphagia: an update on FEES.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Review
- Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Review
- Sharing Our Experience of Operating an Endoscopy Unit in the Midst of a COVID-19 Outbreak.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Revision of Quality Indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.Clinical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Linked color imaging (LCI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopy technology, emphasizes the color of early gastric cancer.Endoscopy international open · 2017Article
- Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing.Clinical endoscopy · 2017Review
- Linked color imaging application for improving the endoscopic diagnosis accuracy: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal endoscopy is effective and safe for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. However, issues regarding endoscope-transmitted infections are emerging. Many countries have established and continuously revise guidelines for endoscope reprocessing in order to prevent infections. While there are common processes used in endoscope reprocessing, differences exist among these guidelines. It is important that the reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes be carried out in accordance with the recommendations for each step of the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.