Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26473050›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2015

Shared Escovopsis parasites between leaf-cutting and non-leaf-cutting ants in the higher attine fungus-growing ant symbiosis.

Lucas A Meirelles, Scott E Solomon, Mauricio Bacci, April M Wright, Ulrich G Mueller, Andre Rodrigues

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The fungusFrontiers in fungal biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Disease management in two sympatricEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  7. Host Susceptibility ModulatesFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucas A MeirellesDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology , UNESP-São Paulo State University , Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil ; Department of Integrative Biology , University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, USA.
Scott E SolomonDepartment of Biosciences , Rice University , Houston, TX, USA.
Mauricio BacciCenter for the Study of Social Insects , UNESP-São Paulo State University , Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
April M WrightDepartment of Integrative Biology , University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, USA.
Ulrich G MuellerDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology , UNESP-São Paulo State University , Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andre RodriguesDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology , UNESP-São Paulo State University , Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRThe University of Texas at Austin · USRice University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungus-gardening (attine) ants grow fungus for food in protected gardens, which contain beneficial, auxiliary microbes, but also microbes harmful to gardens. Among these potentially pathogenic microorganisms, the most consistently isolated are fungi in the genus Escovopsis, which are thought to co-evolve with ants and their cultivar in a tripartite model. To test clade-to-clade correspondence between Escovopsis and ants in the higher attine symbiosis (including leaf-cutting and non-leaf-cutting ants), we amassed a geographically comprehensive collection of Escovopsis from Mexico to southern Brazil, and reconstructed the corresponding Escovopsis phylogeny. Contrary to previous analyses reporting phylogenetic divergence between Escovopsis from leafcutters and Trachymyrmex ants (non-leafcutter), we found no evidence for such specialization; rather, gardens from leafcutters and non-leafcutters genera can sometimes be infected by closely related strains of Escovopsis, suggesting switches at higher phylogenetic levels than previously reported within the higher attine symbiosis. Analyses identified rare Escovopsis strains that might represent biogeographically restricted endemic species. Phylogenetic patterns correspond to morphological variation of vesicle type (hyphal structures supporting spore-bearing cells), separating Escovopsis with phylogenetically derived cylindrical vesicles from ancestral Escovopsis with globose vesicles. The new phylogenetic insights provide an improved basis for future taxonomic and ecological studies of Escovopsis.

Indexed as

ancestral state reconstructionattine antshost–parasite interactionsphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID26473050
PMCPMC4593684
OpenAlexW2175058770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.