Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26472940›Full record

ArticlePopulation health metrics2015

Projected growth of the adult congenital heart disease population in the United States to 2050: an integrative systems modeling approach.

Catherine P Benziger, Karen Stout, Elisa Zaragoza-Macias, Amelia Bertozzi-Villa, Abraham D Flaxman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health metrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inhibition of BKCell death discovery · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine P BenzigerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Karen StoutDepartment of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Elisa Zaragoza-MaciasDepartment of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Amelia Bertozzi-VillaInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Abraham D FlaxmanInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
University of Washington · USInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMortality for children with congenital heart disease (CHD) has declined with improved surgical techniques and neonatal screening; however, as these patients live longer, accurate estimates of the prevalence of adults with CHD are lacking.

methodsTo determine the prevalence and mortality trends of adults with CHD, we combined National Vital Statistics System data and National Health Interview Survey data using an integrative systems model to determine the prevalence of recalled CHD as a function of age, sex, and year (by recalled CHD, we mean positive response to the question "has a doctor told you that (name) has congenital heart disease?", which is a conservative lower-bound estimate of CHD prevalence). We used Human Mortality Database estimates and US Census Department projections of the US population to calculate the CHD-prevalent population by age, sex, and year. The primary outcome was prevalence of recalled CHD in adults from 1970 to 2050; the secondary outcomes were birth prevalence and mortality rates by sex and women of childbearing age (15-49 years).

resultsThe birth prevalence of recalled CHD in 2010 for males was 3.29 per 1,000 (95 % uncertainty interval (UI) 2.8-3.6), and for females was 3.23 per 1,000 (95 % UI 2.3-3.6). From 1968 to 2010, mortality among zero to 51-week-olds declined from 170 to 53 per 100,000 person years. The estimated number of adults (age 20-64 years) with recalled CHD in 1968 was 118,000 (95 % UI 72,000-150,000). By 2010, there was an increase by a factor of 2.3 (95 % UI 2.2-2.6), to 273,000 (95 % UI 190,000-330,000). There will be an estimated 510,000 (95 % UI: 400,000-580,000) in 2050. The prevalence of adults with recalled CHD will begin to plateau around the year 2050. In 2010, there were 134,000 (95 % UI 69,000-160,000) reproductive-age females (age 15-49 years) with recalled CHD in the United States.

conclusionMortality rates have decreased in infants and the prevalence of adults with CHD has increased but will slow down around 2050. This population requires adult medical systems with providers experienced in the care of adult CHD patients, including those familiar with reproduction in women with CHD.

Indexed as

CongenitalHeart defectsMortalityPopulationSurvivalVital statistics

Identifiers

PMID26472940
PMCPMC4606959
OpenAlexW2158371973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.