Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26472563›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Prognostic significance of proline, glutamic acid, leucine rich protein 1 (PELP1) in triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective study on 129 cases.

Yanzhi Zhang, Jiali Dai, Keely M McNamara, Bing Bai, Mumu Shi, Monica S M Chan, Ming Liu, Hironobu Sasano, Xiuli Wang, Xiaolei Li and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanzhi ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. yeach_hmu@126.com.
Jiali DaiDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. daijiali999@163.com.
Keely M McNamaraDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. kmcnamara@patholo2.med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Bing BaiDepartment of Histology and Biology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, Daqing, China. baib_hmu@126.com.
Mumu ShiDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. shimumu2009@139.com.
Monica S M ChanDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. drmonicachan@hotmail.com.
Ming LiuDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. liuming_hmu@126.com.
Hironobu SasanoDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. hsasano@patholo2.med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Xiuli WangDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. wangxiulinihao@sina.cn.
Xiaolei LiDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. xiaoleili2004@163.com.
Lijuan LiuDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. llj19971997@163.com.
Ying MaDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. haorenmaying@126.com.
Shuwen CaoDepartment of Pathology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing, China. caosw_dqytzyy@126.com.
Yanchun XingDepartment of Pathology, Daqing Longnan Hospital, Daqing, China. xingyc_lnhospital@126.com.
Baoshan ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. zhaobs_hmu@126.com.
Yinli SongDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. songyl_hmu@126.com.
Lin WangDepartment of Pathology, Harbin Medical University-Daqing, No. 39 Xinyang Road, Hi-Tech Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China. wangl_cmu@126.com.
Daqing City People's Hospital · CNHarbin Medical University · CNTohoku University · JPDaqing Oilfield General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with an aggressive clinical course due to the lack of therapeutic targets. Therefore, identifying reliable prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets for patients with TNBC is required. Proline, glutamic acid, leucine rich protein 1 (PELP1) is a novel steroidal receptor co-regulator, functioning as an oncogene and its expression is maintained in estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancers. PELP1 has been proposed as a prognostic biomarker in hormone-related cancers, including luminal-type breast cancers, but its significance in TNBC has not been studied.

methodsPELP1 immunoreactivity was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in 129 patients with TNBC. Results were correlated with clinicopathological variables including patient's age, tumor size, lymph node stage, tumor grade, clinical stage, histological type, Ki-67 LI, as well as clinical outcome of the patients, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsPELP1 was localized predominantly in the nuclei of carcinoma cells in TNBC. With the exception of a positive correlation between PELP1 protein expression and lymph node stage (p = 0.027), no significant associations between PELP1 protein expression and other clinicopathological variables, including DFS and OS, were found. However, when PELP1 and Ki-67 LI were grouped together, we found that patients in the PELP1/Ki-67 double high group (n = 48) demonstrated significantly reduced DFS (p = 0.005, log rank test) and OS (p = 0.002, log rank test) than others (n = 81). Multivariable analysis supported PELP1/Ki-67 double high expression as an independent prognostic factor in patients with TNBC, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.020 for recurrence (95 % CL, 1.022-3.990; p = 0.043) and of 2.380 for death (95 % CL, 1.138-4.978; p = 0.021).

conclusionsWe found that evaluating both PELP1 and Ki-67 expression in TNBC could enhance the prognostic sensitivity of the two biomarkers. Therefore, we propose that PELP1/Ki-67 double high expression in tumors is an independent prognostic factor for predicting a poor outcome for patients with TNBC.

Indexed as

PrognosisAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCo-Repressor ProteinsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlutamic AcidHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedProlineReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTranscription FactorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCo-Repressor ProteinsGlutamic AcidKi-67 AntigenPELP1 protein, humanProlineReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26472563
PMCPMC4608314
OpenAlexW2152530485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.