Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26472024›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Simple and rapid determination of homozygous transgenic mice via in vivo fluorescence imaging.

Xiaolin Lin, Junshuang Jia, Yujuan Qin, Xia Lin, Wei Li, Gaofang Xiao, Yanqing Li, Raoying Xie, Hailu Huang, Lin Zhong and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaolin LinCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Junshuang JiaCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yujuan QinCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xia LinCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei LiCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gaofang XiaoCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanqing LiCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Raoying XieCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hailu HuangCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lin ZhongCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qinghong WuInstitute of Comparative Medicine & Laboratory Animal Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wanshan WangInstitute of Comparative Medicine & Laboratory Animal Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenhua HuangDepartment of Anatomy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Construction and Detection in Tissue Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kaitai YaoCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dong XiaoCancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan SunJoint Program in Transfusion Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Southern Medical University · CNHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Setting up breeding programs for transgenic mouse strains require to distinguish homozygous from the heterozygous transgenic animals. The combinational use of the fluorescence reporter transgene and small animal in-vivo imaging system might allow us to rapidly and visually determine the transgenic mice homozygous for transgene(s) by the in vivo fluorescence imaging. RLG, RCLG or Rm17LG transgenic mice ubiquitously express red fluorescent protein (RFP). To identify homozygous RLG transgenic mice, whole-body fluorescence imaging for all of newborn F2-generation littermates produced by mating of RFP-positive heterozygous transgenic mice (F1-generation) derived from the same transgenic founder was performed. Subsequently, the immediate data analysis of the in vivo fluorescence imaging was carried out, which greatly facilitated us to rapidly and readily distinguish RLG transgenic individual(s) with strong fluorescence from the rest of F2-generation littermates, followed by further determining this/these RLG individual(s) showing strong fluorescence to be homozygous, as strongly confirmed by mouse mating. Additionally, homozygous RCLG or Rm17LG transgenic mice were also rapidly and precisely distinguished by the above-mentioned optical approach. This approach allowed us within the shortest time period to obtain 10, 8 and 2 transgenic mice homozygous for RLG, RCLG and Rm17LG transgene, respectively, as verified by mouse mating, indicating the practicality and reliability of this optical method. Taken together, our findings fully demonstrate that the in vivo fluorescence imaging offers a visual, rapid and reliable alternative method to the traditional approaches (i.e., mouse mating and real-time quantitative PCR) in identifying homozygous transgenic mice harboring fluorescence reporter transgene under the control of a ubiquitous promoter in the situation mentioned in this study.

Indexed as

HomozygoteAnimalsBreedingFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicOptical ImagingReproducibility of Resultsfluorescence reporter genehomozygotein vivo qualitative and quantitative fluorescence imagingtransgenic mice

Identifiers

PMID26472024
PMCPMC4766372
OpenAlexW1779945281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.