ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2015
The cardiac repair benefits of inflammation do not persist: evidence from mast cell implantation.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanism study of miR-324-3p driving myocardial infarction progression through regulation of myocardial inflammation.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Complex regulation of cardiac fibrosis: insights from immune cells and signaling pathways.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- The Immune System, An Arrow into the Heart. Principles of Cardioimmunology, An Emerging Branch in Medicine.Current vascular pharmacology · 2025Review
- Mast cells: a novel therapeutic avenue for cardiovascular diseases?Cardiovascular research · 2024Review
- Mast Cells in Cardiac Remodeling: Focus on the Right Ventricle.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Cardiac fibrogenesis: an immuno-metabolic perspective.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Cardiac Mast Cells: A Two-Head Regulator in Cardiac Homeostasis and Pathogenesis Following Injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Melatonin Exerts Cardioprotective Effects by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome-Induced Pyroptosis in Mice following Myocardial Infarction.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
- Aerobic Exercise-Assisted Cardiac Regeneration by Inhibiting Tryptase Release in Mast Cells after Myocardial Infarction.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- RETRACTED: Genetic Deficiency and Pharmacological Stabilization of Mast Cells Ameliorate Pressure Overload-Induced Maladaptive Right Ventricular Remodeling in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Histological Evidence for Therapeutic Induction of Angiogenesis Using Mast Cells and Platelet-Rich Plasma within A Bioengineered Scaffold following Rat Hindlimb Ischemia.Cell journal · 2020Article
- Mast Cells in Liver Fibrogenesis.Cells · 2019Review
- Regulation of Type 2 Immunity in Myocardial Infarction.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Mast Cells in Cardiac Fibrosis: New Insights Suggest Opportunities for Intervention.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Bile duct ligation-induced biliary hyperplasia, hepatic injury, and fibrosis are reduced in mast cell-deficient KitHepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple mechanisms contribute to progressive cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI) and inflammation is an important mediator. Mast cells (MCs) trigger inflammation after MI by releasing bio-active factors that contribute to healing. c-Kit-deficient (Kit(W/W-v) ) mice have dysfunctional MCs and develop severe ventricular dilatation post-MI. We explored the role of MCs in post-MI repair. Mouse wild-type (WT) and Kit(W/W-v) MCs were obtained from bone marrow (BM). MC effects on fibroblasts were examined in vitro by proliferation and gel contraction assays. MCs were implanted into infarcted mouse hearts and their effects were evaluated using molecular, cellular and cardiac functional analyses. In contrast to WT, Kit(W/W-v) MC transplantation into Kit(W/W-v) mice did not improve cardiac function or scar size post-MI. Kit(W/W-v) MCs induced significantly reduced fibroblast proliferation and contraction compared to WT MCs. MC influence on fibroblast proliferation was Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)-dependent and MC-induced fibroblast contractility functioned through transforming growth factor (TGF)-β. WT MCs transiently rescue cardiac function early post-MI, but the benefits of BM cell implantation lasted longer. MCs induced increased inflammation compared to the BM-injected mice, with increased neutrophil infiltration and infarct tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) concentration. This augmented inflammation was followed by increased angiogenesis and myofibroblast formation and reduced scar size at early time-points. Similar to the functional data, these beneficial effects were transient, largely vanishing by day 28. Dysfunctional Kit(W/W-v) MCs were unable to rescue cardiac function post-MI. WT MC implantation transiently enhanced angiogenesis and cardiac function. These data suggest that increased inflammation is beneficial to cardiac repair, but these effects are not persistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.