Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26471478›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurodegeneration2015

Depletion of highly abundant proteins from human cerebrospinal fluid: a cautionary note.

Ramona Günther, Eberhard Krause, Michael Schümann, Ingolf E Blasig, Reiner F Haseloff

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Isobaric Labeling Strategy Utilizing 4-PlexJournal of proteome research · 2020
    Article
  6. Novel CSF biomarkers in genetic frontotemporal dementia identified by proteomics.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramona GüntherLeibniz Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, Robert-Roessle-Str. 10, D-13125, Berlin, Germany.
Eberhard KrauseLeibniz Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, Robert-Roessle-Str. 10, D-13125, Berlin, Germany.
Michael SchümannLeibniz Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, Robert-Roessle-Str. 10, D-13125, Berlin, Germany.
Ingolf E BlasigLeibniz Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, Robert-Roessle-Str. 10, D-13125, Berlin, Germany.
Reiner F HaseloffLeibniz Institute of Molecular Pharmacology, Robert-Roessle-Str. 10, D-13125, Berlin, Germany. haseloff@fmp-berlin.de.
Leibniz Association · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity-based techniques, both for enrichment or depletion of proteins of interest, suffer from unwanted interactions between the bait or matrix material and molecules different from the original target. This effect was quantitatively studied by applying two common procedures for the depletion of albumin/gamma immunoglobulin to human cerebrospinal fluid. Proteins of the depleted and the column-bound fraction were identified by mass spectrometry, employing (18)O labeling for quantitation of their abundance. To different extents, the depletion procedures caused the loss of proteins previously suggested as biomarker candidates for neurological diseases. This is an important phenomenon to consider when quantifying protein levels in biological fluids.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsBiomarkersCerebrospinal Fluid ProteinsHumansSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationBiomarkersCerebrospinal Fluid Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26471478
PMCPMC4608131
OpenAlexW1954828636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.