ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
A novel bi-level meta-analysis approach: applied to biological pathway analysis.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- GSMA: an approach to identify robust global and test Gene Signatures using Meta-Analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Overcoming the matched-sample bottleneck: an orthogonal approach to integrate omic data.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- CCPA: cloud-based, self-learning modules for consensus pathway analysis using GO, KEGG and Reactome.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- RCPA: An Open-Source R Package for Data Processing, Differential Analysis, Consensus Pathway Analysis, and Visualization.Current protocols · 2024Article
- A comprehensive survey of the approaches for pathway analysis using multi-omics data integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- CPA: a web-based platform for consensus pathway analysis and interactive visualization.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- NBIA: a network-based integrative analysis framework - applied to pathway analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Identifying significantly impacted pathways: a comprehensive review and assessment.Genome biology · 2019Review
- R Tutorial: Detection of Differentially Interacting Chromatin Regions From Multiple Hi-C Datasets.Current protocols in bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A Multi-Cohort and Multi-Omics Meta-Analysis Framework to Identify Network-Based Gene Signatures.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Metazoan Parasite Vaccines: Present Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe accumulation of high-throughput data in public repositories creates a pressing need for integrative analysis of multiple datasets from independent experiments. However, study heterogeneity, study bias, outliers and the lack of power of available methods present real challenge in integrating genomic data. One practical drawback of many P-value-based meta-analysis methods, including Fisher's, Stouffer's, minP and maxP, is that they are sensitive to outliers. Another drawback is that, because they perform just one statistical test for each individual experiment, they may not fully exploit the potentially large number of samples within each study.
resultsWe propose a novel bi-level meta-analysis approach that employs the additive method and the Central Limit Theorem within each individual experiment and also across multiple experiments. We prove that the bi-level framework is robust against bias, less sensitive to outliers than other methods, and more sensitive to small changes in signal. For comparative analysis, we demonstrate that the intra-experiment analysis has more power than the equivalent statistical test performed on a single large experiment. For pathway analysis, we compare the proposed framework versus classical meta-analysis approaches (Fisher's, Stouffer's and the additive method) as well as against a dedicated pathway meta-analysis package (MetaPath), using 1252 samples from 21 datasets related to three human diseases, acute myeloid leukemia (9 datasets), type II diabetes (5 datasets) and Alzheimer's disease (7 datasets). Our framework outperforms its competitors to correctly identify pathways relevant to the phenotypes. The framework is sufficiently general to be applied to any type of statistical meta-analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R scripts are available on demand from the authors. CONTACT: sorin@wayne.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.