Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26471409›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2016

Factors affecting the acceptability and consumption of Corn Soya Blend Plus as a prenatal dietary supplement among pregnant women in rural Cambodia.

Amynah Janmohamed, Crystal D Karakochuk, Somchit Boungnasiri, Kyly C Whitfield, Gwen E Chapman, Patricia Janssen, Judy McLean, Timothy J Green

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amynah Janmohamed1Food, Nutrition and Health,The University of British Columbia,215-2205 East Mall,Vancouver,BC,Canada,V6T 1Z4.
Crystal D Karakochuk1Food, Nutrition and Health,The University of British Columbia,215-2205 East Mall,Vancouver,BC,Canada,V6T 1Z4.
Somchit Boungnasiri2International Relief and Development,Cambodia Country Office,Phnom Penh,Cambodia.
Kyly C Whitfield1Food, Nutrition and Health,The University of British Columbia,215-2205 East Mall,Vancouver,BC,Canada,V6T 1Z4.
Gwen E Chapman1Food, Nutrition and Health,The University of British Columbia,215-2205 East Mall,Vancouver,BC,Canada,V6T 1Z4.
Patricia Janssen3School of Population and Public Health,The University of British Columbia,Vancouver,BC,Canada.
Judy McLean1Food, Nutrition and Health,The University of British Columbia,215-2205 East Mall,Vancouver,BC,Canada,V6T 1Z4.
Timothy J Green1Food, Nutrition and Health,The University of British Columbia,215-2205 East Mall,Vancouver,BC,Canada,V6T 1Z4.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUndernutrition is prevalent among pregnant women in Cambodia. The provision of fortified dietary supplements is one strategy to help pregnant women meet their nutritional needs. Corn Soya Blend Plus (CSBP) is a widely used prenatal dietary supplement in areas with high rates of undernutrition and food insecurity. However, little is known about its acceptability during pregnancy. The present study aimed to identify factors that affected the acceptability and consumption of CSBP supplements among pregnant women.

designWomen completed a structured interview designed to provide information on facilitators of and barriers to utilization. In addition, six focus groups were conducted with a subset of women (n 70) to further explore attitudes, perceptions and experiences related to CSBP use.

settingTwo districts in Kampong Chhnang Province, Cambodia. SUBJECTS: Pregnant women (n 288) participating in a cluster-randomized trial of CSBP.

resultsThe acceptability of CSBP was influenced by sensory attributes, family support, peer influences, and attitudes related to diet, nutritional status and weight gain in pregnancy. Attaining adequate nutrition was considered less important than other concerns during pregnancy, particularly anxiety related to the costs of delivery and postpartum care. Acceptance was lower among new mothers due to fears of weight gain. Health benefits were common reasons for continued use and minor side-effects, such as nausea, were not major barriers to consumption.

conclusionsCSBP was generally well accepted in this population. However, organoleptic factors and perceptions regarding nutrition and weight gain in pregnancy, particularly for first-time mothers, were barriers to increasing acceptance among Cambodian women.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorDietary SupplementsMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultCambodiaDietFemaleFocus GroupsGlycine maxHumansPregnancyRural PopulationZea maysAcceptabilityCambodiaConsumptionCorn Soya BlendDietary supplementPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26471409
PMCPMC10270811
OpenAlexW2233019833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.